Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567743›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2014

Combining genetic and demographic information to prioritize conservation efforts for anadromous alewife and blueback herring.

Eric P Palkovacs, Daniel J Hasselman, Emily E Argo, Stephen R Gephard, Karin E Limburg, David M Post, Thomas F Schultz, Theodore V Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric P PalkovacsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Daniel J HasselmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Emily E ArgoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Stephen R GephardInland Fisheries Division, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Old Lyme, CT, USA.
Karin E LimburgDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York Syracuse, NY, USA.
David M PostDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.
Thomas F SchultzDivision of Marine Science and Conservation Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Beaufort, NC, USA.
Theodore V WillisDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Southern Maine Gorham, ME, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in conservation biology is the need to broadly prioritize conservation efforts when demographic data are limited. One method to address this challenge is to use population genetic data to define groups of populations linked by migration and then use demographic information from monitored populations to draw inferences about the status of unmonitored populations within those groups. We applied this method to anadromous alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) and blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis), species for which long-term demographic data are limited. Recent decades have seen dramatic declines in these species, which are an important ecological component of coastal ecosystems and once represented an important fishery resource. Results show that most populations comprise genetically distinguishable units, which are nested geographically within genetically distinct clusters or stocks. We identified three distinct stocks in alewife and four stocks in blueback herring. Analysis of available time series data for spawning adult abundance and body size indicate declines across the US ranges of both species, with the most severe declines having occurred for populations belonging to the Southern New England and the Mid-Atlantic Stocks. While all alewife and blueback herring populations deserve conservation attention, those belonging to these genetic stocks warrant the highest conservation prioritization.

Indexed as

demographydistinct population segmentsecological restorationmicrosatellitespopulation geneticspopulation trendsstock structuretime series

Identifiers

PMID24567743
PMCPMC3927884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.