ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014
Social information and personal interests modulate neural activity during economic decision-making.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Morality is Supreme: The Roles of Morality, Fairness and Group Identity in the Ultimatum Paradigm.Psychology research and behavior management · 2022Article
- Relationship between Children's Intergenerational Emotional Support and Subjective Well-Being among Middle-Aged and Elderly People in China: The Mediation Role of the Sense of Social Fairness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Neural mechanisms of social learning and decision-making.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Atlas-Based Classification Algorithms for Identification of Informative Brain Regions in fMRI Data.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019Article
- Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: The Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Facial identity and emotional expression as predictors during economic decisions.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
- Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Social information affects adults' evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach.PloS one · 2017Article
- The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Article
- Situated affective and social neuroscience.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study we employed electrophysiological recordings to investigate the levels of processing at which positive and negative descriptions of other people bias social decision-making in a game in which participants accepted or rejected economic offers. Besides social information, we manipulated the fairness of the assets distribution, whether offers were advantageous or not for the participant and the uncertainty of the game context. Results show that a negative description of the interaction partner enhanced the medial frontal negativity (MFN) in an additive manner with fairness evaluations. The description of the partner interacted with personal benefit considerations, showing that this positive or negative information only biased the evaluation of offers when they did not favor the participant. P300 amplitudes were enhanced by advantageous offers, suggesting their heightened motivational significance at later stages of processing. Throughout all stages, neural activity was enhanced with certainty about the personal assignments of the split. These results provide new evidence on the importance of interpersonal information and considerations of self-interests relative to others in decision-making situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.