Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014
Medication use in European primary care patients with lower respiratory tract infection: an observational study.
Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of Ambroxol lozenges for pharyngitis: a meta-analysis.BMC family practice · 2014Pooled it
- Predictors for change in cough-related quality of life and symptom severity in acute cough: results of an observational pharmacy-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Comparative in vitro analysis of inhibition of rhinovirus and influenza virus replication by mucoactive secretolytic agents and plant extracts.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- Burden of disease in children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: diary-based cohort study.Family practice · 2019Observational
- Article
- Mucoactive Agents in the Therapy of Upper Respiratory Airways Infections: Fair to Describe Them Just as Mucoactive?Clinical medicine insights. Ear, nose and throat · 2019Review
- Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Help-seeking and antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in a Chinese primary care population: a prospective multicentre observational study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2016Observational
- Cough: impact, beliefs, and expectations from a national survey.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2016Article
- Pharmacist-led minor ailment programs: a Canadian perspective.International journal of general medicine · 2016Review
- Can 88% of patients with acute lower respiratory infection all be special?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is largely unknown what medication is used by patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). AIM To describe the use of self-medication and prescribed medication in adults presenting with LRTI in different European countries, and to relate self-medication to patient characteristics. DESIGN AND SETTING An observational study in 16 primary care networks in 12 European countries. METHOD A total of 2530 adult patients presenting with LRTI in 12 European countries filled in a diary on any medication used before and after a primary care consultation. Patient characteristics related to self-medication were determined by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The frequency and types of medication used differed greatly between European countries. Overall, 55.4% self-medicated before consultation, and 21.5% after consultation, most frequently with paracetamol, antitussives, and mucolytics. Females, non-smokers, and patients with more severe symptoms used more self-medication. Patients who were not prescribed medication during the consultation self-medicated more often afterwards. Self-medication with antibiotics was relatively rare. CONCLUSION A considerable amount of medication, often with no proven efficacy, was used by adults presenting with LRTI in primary care. There were large differences between European countries. These findings should help develop patient information resources, international guidelines, and international legislation concerning the availability of over-the-counter medication, and can also support interventions against unwarranted variations in care. In addition, further research on the effects of symptomatic medication is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.