Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567621›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Medication use in European primary care patients with lower respiratory tract infection: an observational study.

Marleen Hamoen, Berna D L Broekhuizen, Paul Little, Hasse Melbye, Samuel Coenen, Herman Goossens, Chris C Butler, Nick A Francis, Theo J M Verheij, GRACE clinical study group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Cough: impact, beliefs, and expectations from a national survey.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2016
    Article
  10. Pharmacist-led minor ailment programs: a Canadian perspective.International journal of general medicine · 2016
    Review
  11. Can 88% of patients with acute lower respiratory infection all be special?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marleen HamoenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Berna D L Broekhuizen
Paul Little
Hasse Melbye
Samuel Coenen
Herman Goossens
Chris C Butler
Nick A Francis
Theo J M Verheij
GRACE clinical study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND It is largely unknown what medication is used by patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). AIM To describe the use of self-medication and prescribed medication in adults presenting with LRTI in different European countries, and to relate self-medication to patient characteristics. DESIGN AND SETTING An observational study in 16 primary care networks in 12 European countries. METHOD A total of 2530 adult patients presenting with LRTI in 12 European countries filled in a diary on any medication used before and after a primary care consultation. Patient characteristics related to self-medication were determined by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The frequency and types of medication used differed greatly between European countries. Overall, 55.4% self-medicated before consultation, and 21.5% after consultation, most frequently with paracetamol, antitussives, and mucolytics. Females, non-smokers, and patients with more severe symptoms used more self-medication. Patients who were not prescribed medication during the consultation self-medicated more often afterwards. Self-medication with antibiotics was relatively rare. CONCLUSION A considerable amount of medication, often with no proven efficacy, was used by adults presenting with LRTI in primary care. There were large differences between European countries. These findings should help develop patient information resources, international guidelines, and international legislation concerning the availability of over-the-counter medication, and can also support interventions against unwarranted variations in care. In addition, further research on the effects of symptomatic medication is needed.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitussive AgentsExpectorantsPrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsSelf MedicationAdultEuropeFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationAcetaminophenAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitussive AgentsExpectorantsantibioticscoughdrug therapyprimary health carerespiratory tract infectionsself medication

Identifiers

PMID24567621
PMCPMC3905423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.