Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567380›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Radiation dose rates now and in the future for residents neighboring restricted areas of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

Kouji H Harada, Tamon Niisoe, Mie Imanaka, Tomoyuki Takahashi, Katsumi Amako, Yukiko Fujii, Masatoshi Kanameishi, Kenji Ohse, Yasumichi Nakai, Tamami Nishikawa and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dietary exposure levels toEnvironmental health and preventive medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Disproportionately High Contributions of 60 Year Old Weapons-Environmental science & technology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of Ionizing Radiation in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mushrooms: from nutrition to mycoremediation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Kouji H HaradaDepartment of Health and Environmental Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 6068501, Japan.
Tamon Niisoe
Mie Imanaka
Tomoyuki Takahashi
Katsumi Amako
Yukiko Fujii
Masatoshi Kanameishi
Kenji Ohse
Yasumichi Nakai
Tamami Nishikawa
Yuuichi Saito
Hiroko Sakamoto
Keiko Ueyama
Kumiko Hisaki
Eiji Ohara
Tokiko Inoue
Kanako Yamamoto
Yukiyo Matsuoka
Hitomi Ohata
Kazue Toshima
Ayumi Okada
Hitomi Sato
Toyomi Kuwamori
Hiroko Tani
Reiko Suzuki
Mai Kashikura
Michiko Nezu
Yoko Miyachi
Fusako Arai
Masanori Kuwamori
Sumiko Harada
Akira Ohmori
Hirohiko Ishikawa
Akio Koizumi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation dose rates were evaluated in three areas neighboring a restricted area within a 20- to 50-km radius of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in August-September 2012 and projected to 2022 and 2062. Study participants wore personal dosimeters measuring external dose equivalents, almost entirely from deposited radionuclides (groundshine). External dose rate equivalents owing to the accident averaged 1.03, 2.75, and 1.66 mSv/y in the village of Kawauchi, the Tamano area of Soma, and the Haramachi area of Minamisoma, respectively. Internal dose rates estimated from dietary intake of radiocesium averaged 0.0058, 0.019, and 0.0088 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. Dose rates from inhalation of resuspended radiocesium were lower than 0.001 mSv/y. In 2012, the average annual doses from radiocesium were close to the average background radiation exposure (2 mSv/y) in Japan. Accounting only for the physical decay of radiocesium, mean annual dose rates in 2022 were estimated as 0.31, 0.87, and 0.53 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. The simple and conservative estimates are comparable with variations in the background dose, and unlikely to exceed the ordinary permissible dose rate (1 mSv/y) for the majority of the Fukushima population. Health risk assessment indicates that post-2012 doses will increase lifetime solid cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer incidences by 1.06%, 0.03% and 0.28% respectively, in Tamano. This assessment was derived from short-term observation with uncertainties and did not evaluate the first-year dose and radioiodine exposure. Nevertheless, this estimate provides perspective on the long-term radiation exposure levels in the three regions.

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentRadiation DosageCesium RadioisotopesEnvironmental ExposureForecastingGeographyHumansJapanNeoplasmsRadiation MonitoringRisk FactorsCesium Radioisotopesexposure assessmentfood duplicateforest contaminationFukushima nuclear disasterStrontium-90

Identifiers

PMID24567380
PMCPMC3956155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.