Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567338›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Identification of target binding site in photoreceptor guanylyl cyclase-activating protein 1 (GCAP1).

Igor V Peshenko, Elena V Olshevskaya, Sunghyuk Lim, James B Ames, Alexander M Dizhoor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dimerization of Neuronal Calcium Sensor Proteins.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Igor V PeshenkoFrom the Department of Basic Sciences and the Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania 19027 and.
Elena V Olshevskaya
Sunghyuk Lim
James B Ames
Alexander M Dizhoor
Salus University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

REGULATION OF CYCLIC GMP SYNTHESIS IN PHOTORECEPTORSR01EY011522 · NEI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER M DIZHOOR · 1996 to 2026
$9.9M
MEMBRANE TARGETING CALCIUM SENSORS IN VISIONR01EY012347 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI AMES, JAMES B · 1999 to 2023
$6.9M
NEI NIH HHS EY012347NEI NIH HHS EY11522NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011522NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal guanylyl cyclase (RetGC)-activating proteins (GCAPs) regulate visual photoresponse and trigger congenital retinal diseases in humans, but GCAP interaction with its target enzyme remains obscure. We mapped GCAP1 residues comprising the RetGC1 binding site by mutagenizing the entire surface of GCAP1 and testing the ability of each mutant to bind RetGC1 in a cell-based assay and to activate it in vitro. Mutations that most strongly affected the activation of RetGC1 localized to a distinct patch formed by the surface of non-metal-binding EF-hand 1, the loop and the exiting helix of EF-hand 2, and the entering helix of EF-hand 3. Mutations in the binding patch completely blocked activation of the cyclase without affecting Ca(2+) binding stoichiometry of GCAP1 or its tertiary fold. Exposed residues in the C-terminal portion of GCAP1, including EF-hand 4 and the helix connecting it with the N-terminal lobe of GCAP1, are not critical for activation of the cyclase. GCAP1 mutants that failed to activate RetGC1 in vitro were GFP-tagged and co-expressed in HEK293 cells with mOrange-tagged RetGC1 to test their direct binding in cyto. Most of the GCAP1 mutations introduced into the "binding patch" prevented co-localization with RetGC1, except for Met-26, Lys-85, and Trp-94. With these residues mutated, GCAP1 completely failed to stimulate cyclase activity but still bound RetGC1 and competed with the wild type GCAP1. Thus, RetGC1 activation by GCAP1 involves establishing a tight complex through the binding patch with an additional activation step involving Met-26, Lys-85, and Trp-94.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBinding SitesCattleGuanylate CyclaseGuanylate Cyclase-Activating ProteinsHEK293 CellsHumansMultiprotein ComplexesMutation, MissenseProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Cell SurfaceGuanylate Cyclaseguanylate cyclase 1Guanylate Cyclase-Activating ProteinsGUCA1A protein, humanMultiprotein ComplexesReceptors, Cell SurfaceCalcium-binding ProteinsCyclic GMP (cGMP)EyeGuanylate CyclaseNeurobiologyPhototransduction

Identifiers

PMID24567338
PMCPMC3974984
OpenAlexW2018309862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.