Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567308›Full record

ArticleGenome research2014

Tempo and mode of regulatory evolution in Drosophila.

Joseph D Coolon, C Joel McManus, Kraig R Stevenson, Brenton R Graveley, Patricia J Wittkopp

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gene function predicts divergence across molecular levels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hybrids reveal accessible chromatinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. ASPEN: Robust detection of allelic dynamics in single cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hybrid incompatibility emerges at the one-cell stage in interspeciesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Intraspecific gene regulation in cis- and trans.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph D CoolonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA;
C Joel McManus
Kraig R Stevenson
Brenton R Graveley
Patricia J Wittkopp
University of Michigan · USCarnegie Mellon University · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Trans-Splicing in DrosophilaR01GM095296 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI GRAVELEY, BRENTON R. · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Using next-generation sequencing to understand the evolution of gene regulationF32GM089009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COOLON, JOSEPH DAVID · 2010 to 2011
$99k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM089009-02NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM095296NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM089009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic changes affecting gene expression contribute to phenotypic divergence; thus, understanding how regulatory networks controlling gene expression change over time is critical for understanding evolution. Prior studies of expression differences within and between species have identified properties of regulatory divergence, but technical and biological differences among these studies make it difficult to assess the generality of these properties or to understand how regulatory changes accumulate with divergence time. Here, we address these issues by comparing gene expression among strains and species of Drosophila with a range of divergence times and use F1 hybrids to examine inheritance patterns and disentangle cis- and trans-regulatory changes. We find that the fixation of compensatory changes has caused the regulation of gene expression to diverge more rapidly than gene expression itself. Specifically, we observed that the proportion of genes with evidence of cis-regulatory divergence has increased more rapidly with divergence time than the proportion of genes with evidence of expression differences. Surprisingly, the amount of expression divergence explained by cis-regulatory changes did not increase steadily with divergence time, as was previously proposed. Rather, one species (Drosophila sechellia) showed an excess of cis-regulatory divergence that we argue most likely resulted from positive selection in this lineage. Taken together, this work reveals not only the rate at which gene expression evolves, but also the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms responsible for this evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24567308
PMCPMC4009609
OpenAlexW2002604364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.