ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2014
Shoulder biomechanics and the success of translational research.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Matlab toolbox for scaled-generic modeling of shoulder and elbow.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Validity and reliability of arm abduction angle measured on smartphone: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Article
- Studying Upper-Limb Kinematics Using Inertial Sensors Embedded in Mobile Phones.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2009, the International Shoulder Group (ISG) had the opportunity to propose to the readers of Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing a Special Issue on shoulder biomechanics. At that time, we pointed out that the field was evolving to include more applied research. After 4 years, we can confirm that impression: 10 out of 12 papers included in this second Special Issue deal with clinical related questions, through theoretical and experimental methodologies. This demonstrates that the translational research at the base of ISG foundation in 1989 is effective. We think that the papers of this issue will have an impact on clinics in general and on the treatment of work-related injuries and diseases in particular. Based on the statistics of the Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), injuries at the shoulder are first in terms of average duration of "temporary total disability to work". Moreover, occupational diseases at the shoulder in the industrial and services sector represented 16 % of all occupational diseases in 2012, i.e., 46 % of those related to the upper limb. These data stress the need for specific interventions, with the contribution of both researchers and policy makers. Starting from the papers included here, we would encourage additional efforts on: (1) quantitative analysis of shoulder loading during tasks associated with musculoskeletal injuries, and ways to reduce that loading, (2) simple and effective tools to improve the diagnosis and outcome assessment of motion-related shoulder diseases, and (3) the development of rehabilitation treatments focused on occupational tasks, taking advantage of state-of-the-art biofeedback technologies, and exploiting the power of biomechanical models for muscle force prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.