Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567065›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2014

Pain and the context.

Elisa Carlino, Elisa Frisaldi, Fabrizio Benedetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Nocebo Effect: A Review of Contemporary Experimental Research.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Placebo and nocebo effect in pain.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Complexity theory in the management of patients with musculoskeletal painBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Touch and social support influence interpersonal synchrony and pain.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa CarlinoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy.
Elisa FrisaldiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio BenedettiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a sensory and emotional experience that is substantially modulated by psychological, social and contextual factors. Research now indicates that the influence of these factors is even more powerful than expected and involves the therapeutic response to analgesic drugs as well as the pain experience itself, which in some circumstances can even be a form of reward. Different experimental approaches and models, both in the laboratory and in the clinical setting, have been used to better characterize and understand the complex neurobiology of pain modulation. These approaches include placebo analgesia, nocebo hyperalgesia, hidden administration of analgesics, and the manipulation of the pain-reward relationship. Overall, these studies show that different neurochemical systems are activated in different positive and negative contexts. Moreover, pain can activate reward mechanisms when experienced within contexts that have special positive meaning. Because routine medical practice usually takes place in contexts that use different rituals, these neurobiological insights might have profound clinical implications.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsBrainEmotionsHumansHyperalgesiaPainPlacebo EffectAnalgesics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.