Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567054›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2014

Prenatal antidepressant exposure: clinical and preclinical findings.

Chase H Bourke, Zachary N Stowe, Michael J Owens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. ACS chemical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening for Aromatase Inhibitors in the Tox21 10K Library.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chase H Bourke
Zachary N Stowe
Michael J Owens
Emory University · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

The Impact of Maternal Depression, Anxiety, and StressP50MH077928 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEWPORT, DONALD JEFFREY · 2007 to 2011
$9.6M
Graduate and Postdoctoral Training in ToxicologyT32ES012870 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2004 to 2026
$9.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES012870NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES012870NIMH NIH HHS MH077928NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH077928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological treatment of any maternal illness during pregnancy warrants consideration of the consequences of the illness and/or medication for both the mother and unborn child. In the case of major depressive disorder, which affects up to 10-20% of pregnant women, the deleterious effects of untreated depression on the offspring can be profound and long lasting. Progress has been made in our understanding of the mechanism(s) of action of antidepressants, fetal exposure to these medications, and serotonin's role in development. New technologies and careful study designs have enabled the accurate sampling of maternal serum, breast milk, umbilical cord serum, and infant serum psychotropic medication concentrations to characterize the magnitude of placental transfer and exposure through human breast milk. Despite this progress, the extant clinical literature is largely composed of case series, population-based patient registry data that are reliant on nonobjective means and retrospective recall to determine both medication and maternal depression exposure, and limited inclusion of suitable control groups for maternal depression. Conclusions drawn from such studies often fail to incorporate embryology/neurotransmitter ontogeny, appropriate gestational windows, or a critical discussion of statistically versus clinically significant. Similarly, preclinical studies have predominantly relied on dosing models, leading to exposures that may not be clinically relevant. The elucidation of a defined teratological effect or mechanism, if any, has yet to be conclusively demonstrated. The extant literature indicates that, in many cases, the benefits of antidepressant use during pregnancy for a depressed pregnant woman may outweigh potential risks.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBehavior, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24567054
PMCPMC3973612
OpenAlexW2148355891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.