Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24565953›Full record

Observational studyOsteoarthritis and cartilage2014

Osteoarthritis and the rule of halves.

L Sheikh, B I Nicholl, D J Green, J Bedson, G Peat

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research into practice: improving musculoskeletal care in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L SheikhMedical School, Keele University, UK. Electronic address: lubnas@doctors.org.uk.
B I NichollGeneral Practice & Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: Barbara.Nicholl@glasgow.ac.uk.
D J GreenArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK. Electronic address: d.j.green@keele.ac.uk.
J BedsonArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK. Electronic address: j.bedson@keele.ac.uk.
G PeatArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK. Electronic address: g.m.peat@keele.ac.uk.

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18174Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386Medical Research Council G0501798Medical Research Council G9900220Versus Arthritis 18174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic osteoarthritis poses a major challenge to primary health care but no studies have related accessing primary care ('detection'), receiving recommended treatments ('treatment'), and achieving adequate control ('control').

objectiveTo provide estimates of detection, treatment, and control within a single population adapting the approach used to determine a Rule of Halves for other long-term conditions.

settingGeneral population.

participants400 adults aged 50+ years with prevalent symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

designProspective cohort with baseline questionnaire, clinical assessment, and plain radiographs, and questionnaire follow-up at 18 and 36 months and linkage to primary care medical records. OUTCOME MEASURES: 'Detection' was defined as at least one musculoskeletal knee-related GP consultation between baseline and 36 months. 'Treatment' was self-reported use of at least one recommended treatment or physiotherapy/hospital specialist referral for their knee problem at all three measurement points. Pain was 'controlled' if characteristic pain intensity <5 out of 10 on at least two occasions.

resultsIn 221 cases (55.3%; 95%CI: 50.4, 60.1) there was evidence that the current problem had been detected in general practice. Of those detected, 164 (74.2% (68.4, 80.0)) were receiving one or more of the recommended treatments at all three measurement points. Of those detected and treated, 45 (27.4% (20.5, 34.3)) had symptoms under control on at least two occasions. Using narrower definitions resulted in substantially lower estimates.

conclusionOsteoarthritis care does not conform to a Rule of Halves. Symptom control is low among those accessing health care and receiving treatment.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeOsteoarthritisPrimary careRule of Halves

Identifiers

PMID24565953
PMCPMC3988991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.