Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24565832›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2014

Evaluation of the potential of antipsychotic agents to induce catalepsy in rats: assessment of a new, commercially available, semi-automated instrument.

Barbara Bricker, Dinithia Sampson, Seth Y Ablordeppey

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychotropic Effects of an Alcoholic Extract from the Leaves ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  6. Further evaluation of the tropane analogs of haloperidol.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara BrickerDivision of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Dinithia SampsonDivision of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Seth Y AblordeppeyDivision of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University · US

Funding

Recruitment and HiringG12MD007582 · NIMHD · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI SOLIMAN, KARAM F.A. · 2012 to 2017
$16.0M
Targeted Nanocarrier Combination Based Therapy for Lung CancerP20MD006738 · NIMHD · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI RAHMAN, SALEH MD. MAHMUDUR · 2012 to 2016
$5.6M
Development of Novel Agents for CNS-related DiseasesSC1GM088451 · NIGMS · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI ABLORDEPPEY, SETH Y · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH CENTERC06RR012512 · NCRR · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI LEWIS, HENRY · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS 1C06-RR12512-01NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012512NIGMS NIH HHS 5SC1GM088451-01-04NIGMS NIH HHS SC1 GM088451NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007582NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haloperidol induced catalepsy was determined using the classic bar test and a new MED Associates Catalepsy Test Chamber instrument. The dose that produced an adverse effect in 50% of rats (AED50) for haloperidol was calculated using the instrument data as 0.29 mg/kg. Hand scoring of the video recordings gave AED50 values of 0.30 and 0.31 mg/kg, both well within the 95% CL of the instrument data. Clozapine was also evaluated and catalepsy was not detected up to 40 mg/kg. No significant difference was found between the instrument and hand scoring data. The instrument was useful for testing haloperidol and clozapine, relieving much of the tedium and variability experienced without its use. It was especially valuable at measuring shorter time periods, where the researcher cannot react as quickly. Finally, olanzapine was also evaluated. However, clenched forepaws and hind paws prevented the use of the instrument alone at higher doses. A backup stopwatch was used for the bar test in these cases. Some of the advantages and limitations are discussed. Results are also compared to the crossed-legs position (CLP) test for all three antipsychotics. While haloperidol gave similar results at all concentrations tested, clozapine deviated significantly at the highest dose (40 mg/kg) displaying catalepsy in the CLP test but not in the bar test. Olanzapine displayed catalepsy in rats significantly different from vehicle at 40 mg/kg in both the bar and CLP tests. However, the CLP test may be more suited to compounds with gripping problems which prevent the consistent grasping of the bar. Overall, the instrument was found to be a useful aid in conducting the bar test for catalepsy. The CLP test was found to complement the bar test under certain conditions and could provide additional data that might be missed by the bar test for compounds producing grasping problems.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBenzodiazepinesCatalepsyClozapineHaloperidolHand StrengthMaleOlanzapinePosturePsychology, ExperimentalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesClozapineHaloperidolOlanzapineAtypical antipsychoticsBar test for catalepsyCatalepsy instrumentCrossed-leg position (CLP) testExtrapyramidal side effect (EPS)Typical antipsychotics

Identifiers

PMID24565832
PMCPMC3992273
OpenAlexW2086268477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.