ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
Assessment of antihistamine use in early pregnancy and birth defects.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Medication use during pregnancy and the risk of gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Pooled it
- The Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome After First Trimester Exposure to H1 Antihistamines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2017Pooled it
- Antihistamines and birth defects: a systematic review of the literature.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2014Pooled it
- A Streamlined Treatment Algorithm for Allergic Rhinitis in the Arab Region: Expert Panel Opinion.Cureus · 2025Article
- Analysis of umbilical cord tissue as an indicator ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Urticaria in Pregnancy and Lactation.Frontiers in allergy · 2022Review
- Chiral Transplacental Pharmacokinetics of Fexofenadine: Impact of P-Glycoprotein Inhibitor Fluoxetine Using the Human Placental Perfusion Model.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Article
- Long-Term Functional and Cytoarchitectonic Effects of the Systemic Administration of the Histamine HFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Use of antihistamine medications during early pregnancy and selected birth defects: The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.Birth defects research · 2020Article
- Selecting a pharmacotherapy regimen for patients with chronic insomnia.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2020Review
- A Benefit Risk Review of Pediatric Use of Hydrocodone/Chlorpheniramine, a Prescription Opioid Antitussive Agent for the Treatment of Cough.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2019Review
- The safety or risk of antihistamine use in pregnancy: reassuring data are helpful but not sufficient.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have reported an association between use of specific antihistamines in early pregnancy and certain specific birth defects.
objectiveTo test 16 previously hypothesized associations between specific antihistamines and specific birth defects, and to identify possible new associations.
methodsWe used 1998-2010 data from the Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study, a multicenter case-control surveillance program of birth defects in North America. Mothers were interviewed within 6 months of delivery about demographic, reproductive, medical, and behavioral factors, and details on the use of prescription and nonprescription medications. We compared first trimester exposure to specific antihistamines between 13,213 infants with specific malformations and 6982 nonmalformed controls by using conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for potential confounders, including indication for use.
resultsOverall, 13.7% of controls were exposed to antihistamines during the first trimester. The most commonly used medications were diphenhydramine (4.2%), loratadine (3.1%), doxylamine (1.9%), and chlorpheniramine (1.7%). When estimates were stable, none supported the previously hypothesized associations. Among more than 100 exploratory comparisons of other specific antihistamine-defect pairs, 14 had odds ratios ≥1.5, of which 6 had 95% CI bounds excluding 1.0 before but not after adjustment for multiple comparisons.
conclusionOur findings do not provide meaningful support for previously posited associations between antihistamines and major congenital anomalies; at the same time, we identified associations that had not been previously suggested. We suspect that previous associations may be chance findings in the context of multiple comparisons, a situation that may also apply to our new findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.