Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24565465›Full record

SynthesisClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2014

Activity of 129 single-agent drugs in 228 phase I and II clinical trials in multiple myeloma.

K Martin Kortuem, Kaitlyn Zidich, Steven R Schuster, Meaghan L Khan, Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda, Joseph R Mikhael, Rafael Fonseca, A Keith Stewart

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K Martin KortuemDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Kaitlyn ZidichDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Steven R SchusterDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Meaghan L KhanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Victor H Jimenez-ZepedaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Joseph R MikhaelDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Rafael FonsecaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
A Keith StewartDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. Electronic address: Stewart.Keith@mayo.edu.

Funding

Translation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Multiple MyelomaR01CA167511 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI STEWART, ALEXANDER KEITH · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 400 preclinical studies report ≥ 1 compound as cytotoxic to multiple myeloma (MM) cells; however, few of these agents became relevant in the clinic. Thus, the utility of such assays in predicting future clinical value is debatable. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe examined the application of early-phase trial experiences to predict future clinical adoption. We identified 129 drugs explored as single agents in 228 trials involving 7421 patients between 1961 and 2013.

resultsAll drugs in common use in MM (melphalan, dexamethasone, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and doxorubicin) demonstrated a best reported response rate of ≥ 22%. Older agents, including teniposide, fotemustine, paclitaxel, and interferon, also appear active by this criterion; however, if mean response rates from all reported trials for an agent are considered, then only drugs with a mean response rate of 15% partial response are in clinical use.

conclusionOur analysis suggests that thresholds of 20% for best or 15% for mean response are highly predictive of future clinical success. Below these thresholds, no drug has yet reached regulatory approval or widespread use in the clinic. Thus, this benchmark provides 1 element of the framework for guiding choice of drugs for late-stage clinical testing.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansMultiple MyelomaTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsDrugsEarly clinical trialsMultiple myelomaPhase 1Single-agent activity

Identifiers

PMID24565465
PMCPMC4092053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.