ArticleBMC systems biology2013
Active enhancer positions can be accurately predicted from chromatin marks and collective sequence motif data.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of target genes and functional types of cis-regulatory modules in the human genome reveals their distinct properties.BMC biology · 2025Article
- A map of cis-regulatory modules and constituent transcription factor binding sites in 80% of the mouse genome.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Accurate prediction of functional states of cis-regulatory modules reveals common epigenetic rules in humans and mice.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Genome-wide identification of associations between enhancer and alternative splicing in human and mouse.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Taking promoters out of enhancers in sequence based predictions of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- EP-DNN: A Deep Neural Network-Based Global Enhancer Prediction Algorithm.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- In silico identification of enhancers on the basis of a combination of transcription factor binding motif occurrences.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Computational schemes for the prediction and annotation of enhancers from epigenomic assays.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015Review
- An Annotation Agnostic Algorithm for Detecting Nascent RNA Transcripts in GRO-Seq.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscriptional regulation in multi-cellular organisms is a complex process involving multiple modular regulatory elements for each gene. Building whole-genome models of transcriptional networks requires mapping all relevant enhancers and then linking them to target genes. Previous methods of enhancer identification based either on sequence information or on epigenetic marks have different limitations stemming from incompleteness of each of these datasets taken separately.
resultsIn this work we present a new approach for discovery of regulatory elements based on the combination of sequence motifs and epigenetic marks measured with ChIP-Seq. Our method uses supervised learning approaches to train a model describing the dependence of enhancer activity on sequence features and histone marks. Our results indicate that using combination of features provides superior results to previous approaches based on either one of the datasets. While histone modifications remain the dominant feature for accurate predictions, the models based on sequence motifs have advantages in their general applicability to different tissues. Additionally, we assess the relevance of different sequence motifs in prediction accuracy showing that even tissue-specific enhancer activity depends on multiple motifs.
conclusionsBased on our results, we conclude that it is worthwhile to include sequence motif data into computational approaches to active enhancer prediction and also that classifiers trained on a specific set of enhancers can generalize with significant accuracy beyond the training set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.