ArticleBMC systems biology2013
Inferring functional transcription factor-gene binding pairs by integrating transcription factor binding data with transcription factor knockout data.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRM-TI: an enhanced pipeline for computationally assigning the target genes of cis-regulatory modules by considering comprehensive long-range regulation mechanisms.BioData mining · 2026Article
- KDmarkers: A biomarker database for investigating epigenetic methylation and gene expression levels in Kawasaki disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- SSRTool: A web tool for evaluating RNA secondary structure predictions based on species-specific functional interpretability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- YTLR: Extracting yeast transcription factor-gene associations from the literature using automated literature readers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Human IRES Atlas: an integrative platform for studying IRES-driven translational regulation in humans.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Cancer DEIso: An integrative analysis platform for investigating differentially expressed gene-level and isoform-level human cancer markers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Lessons from eRNAs: understanding transcriptional regulation through the lens of nascent RNAs.Transcription · 2020Review
- Transcription factor regulatory modules provide the molecular mechanisms for functional redundancy observed among transcription factors in yeast.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Functional redundancy of transcription factors explains why most binding targets of a transcription factor are not affected when the transcription factor is knocked out.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments are now the most comprehensive experimental approaches for mapping the binding of transcription factors (TFs) to their target genes. However, ChIP data alone is insufficient for identifying functional binding target genes of TFs for two reasons. First, there is an inherent high false positive/negative rate in ChIP-chip or ChIP-seq experiments. Second, binding signals in the ChIP data do not necessarily imply functionality.
methodsIt is known that ChIP-chip data and TF knockout (TFKO) data reveal complementary information on gene regulation. While ChIP-chip data can provide TF-gene binding pairs, TFKO data can provide TF-gene regulation pairs. Therefore, we propose a novel network approach for identifying functional TF-gene binding pairs by integrating the ChIP-chip data with the TFKO data. In our method, a TF-gene binding pair from the ChIP-chip data is regarded to be functional if it also has high confident curated TFKO TF-gene regulatory relation or deduced hypostatic TF-gene regulatory relation. RESULTS AND
conclusionsWe first validated our method on a gathered ground truth set. Then we applied our method to the ChIP-chip data to identify functional TF-gene binding pairs. The biological significance of our identified functional TF-gene binding pairs was shown by assessing their functional enrichment, the prevalence of protein-protein interaction, and expression coherence. Our results outperformed the results of three existing methods across all measures. And our identified functional targets of TFs also showed statistical significance over the randomly assigned TF-gene pairs. We also showed that our method is dataset independent and can apply to ChIP-seq data and the E. coli genome. Finally, we provided an example showing the biological applicability of our notion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.