ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2013
Media, messages, and medication: strategies to reconcile what patients hear, what they want, and what they need from medications.
Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Beliefs and Obesity Bias as Determinants of Attitudes Toward the Rising Tides of GLP-1 Medications: Mounjaro and Ozempic.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional study of parental knowledge, behaviour and anxiety in management of paediatric fever among German parents.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisement and Prescribing Practices: Evidence Review and Practical Guidance for Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Review
- Conceptualization, Development and Psychometric Evaluations of a New Medication-Related Health Literacy Instrument: The Chinese Medication Literacy Measurement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Statins in a Distorted Mirror of Media.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- Herbal supplements in the print media: communicating benefits and risks.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019Article
- Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications: what the Canadian medical trainee needs to know.Canadian medical education journal · 2019Article
- Impact of statin related media coverage on use of statins: interrupted time series analysis with UK primary care data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- The Impact of Online Social Networks on Health and Health Systems: A Scoping Review and Case Studies.Policy & internet · 2015Article
- Deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults: a scoping review.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2015Article
- Direct to consumer advertising: the case for greater consumer control.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Web search behavior and information needs of people with multiple sclerosis: focus group study and analysis of online postings.Interactive journal of medical research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past 30 years, patients' options for accessing information about prescription drugs have expanded dramatically. In this narrative review, we address four questions: (1) What information sources are patients exposed to, and are they paying attention? (2) Is the information they hear credible and accurate? (3) When patients ask for a prescription, what do they really want and need? Finally, (4) How can physicians reconcile what patients hear, want, and need? ANALYSIS: A critical synthesis of the literature is reported. Observations indicate that the public is generally aware of and attends to a growing body of health information resources, including traditional news media, advertising, and social networking. However, lay audiences often have no reliable way to assess the accuracy of health information found in the media, on the Internet, or in direct-to-consumer advertising. This inability to assess the information can lead to decision paralysis, with patients questioning what is known, what is knowable, and what their physicians know. Many patients have specific expectations for the care they wish to receive and have little difficulty making those expectations known. However, there are hazards in assuming that patients' expressed desires are direct reflections of their underlying wants or needs. In trying to reconcile patients' wants and needs for information about prescription medicines, a combination of policy and clinical initiatives may offer greater promise than either approach alone.
conclusionsPatients are bombarded by information about medicines. The problem is not a lack of information; rather, it is knowing what information to trust. Making sure patients get the medications they need and are prepared to take them safely requires a combination of policy and clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.