Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24565019›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Complex realities: community engagement for a paediatric randomized controlled malaria vaccine trial in Kilifi, Kenya.

Vibian Angwenyi, Dorcas Kamuya, Dorothy Mwachiro, Betty Kalama, Vicki Marsh, Patricia Njuguna, Sassy Molyneux

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00866619 (Efficacy of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Malaria Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00866619 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Malaria Vaccine (257049) Against Malaria Disease Caused by P. Falciparum Infection in Infants and Children in Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2009 to 2014Enrolled15,459ConditionsMalariaArmsMalaria Vaccine 257049, Meningococcal C Conjugate Vaccine, Cell-culture rabies vaccine, TritanrixHepB/Hib, Polio Sabin Oral Polio Vaccine (GSK)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vibian Angwenyi
Dorcas Kamuya
Dorothy Mwachiro
Betty Kalama
Vicki Marsh
Patricia Njuguna
Sassy MolyneuxThe Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P,O, Box, 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya. SMolyneux@kemri-wellcome.org.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity engagement (CE) is increasingly promoted for biomedical research conducted in resource poor settings for both intrinsic and instrumental purposes. Given the potential importance of CE, but also complexities and possibility of unexpected negative outcomes, there is need for more documentation of CE processes in practice. We share experiences of formal CE for a paediatric randomized controlled malaria vaccine trial conducted in three sites within Kilifi County, Kenya.

methodsSocial scientists independent of the trial held in-depth individual interviews with trial researchers (n=5), community leaders (n=8) and parents (15 with enrolled children and 4 without); and group discussions with fieldworkers (n=6) and facility staff (n=2). We conducted a survey of participating households (n=200) and observed over 150 CE activities.

resultsThe overall CE plan was similar across the three study sites, although less community-based information in site C. Majority perceived CE activities to clear pre-existing concerns and misconceptions; increase visibility, awareness of and trust in trial staff. Challenges included: some community leaders attempting to exert pressure on people to enrol; local wording in information sheets and consent forms feeding into serious anxieties about the trial; and concerns about reduced CE over time. Negative effects of these challenges were mitigated through changes to on-going CE activities, and final information sharing and consent being conducted individually by trained clinical staff. One year after enrolment, 31% (n = 62) of participants' parents reported malaria prevention as the main aim of the activities their children were involved in, and 93% wanted their children to remain involved.

conclusionThe trial teams' goals for CE were relatively clear from the outset. Other actors' hopes and expectations (like higher allowances and future employment) were not openly discussed, but emerged over the course of engagements. Encouraging open discussion of all actors' intentions and goals from the outset takes time, risks raising expectations that cannot be met, and is complex. However, doing so in future similar trials may allow successes here to be built upon, and some challenges minimized or avoided.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00866619 (registration 19-Mar-2009).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesCommunity-Institutional RelationsPatient SelectionRural Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack PeopleComprehensionCooperative BehaviorCultural CharacteristicsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24565019
PMCPMC3974049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.