Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564953›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2013

Toward a 3D model of human brain development for studying gene/environment interactions.

Helena T Hogberg, Joseph Bressler, Kimberly M Christian, Georgina Harris, Georgia Makri, Cliona O'Driscoll, David Pamies, Lena Smirnova, Zhexing Wen, Thomas Hartung

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Merits and challenges of iPSC-derived organoids for clinical applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Human IPSC-Derived Model to Study Myelin Disruption.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mass Generation, Neuron Labeling, and 3D Imaging of Minibrains.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena T Hogberg
Joseph Bressler
Kimberly M Christian
Georgina Harris
Georgia Makri
Cliona O'Driscoll
David Pamies
Lena Smirnova
Zhexing Wen
Thomas Hartung
University of Konstanz · DEJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

A 3D Model of Human Brain Development for Studying Gene/Environment InteractionsU18TR000547 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HARTUNG, THOMAS · 2012 to 2013
$865k
Developmental neurotoxicity pathways for high throughput testing by metabolomicsU01FD004230 · FDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HARTUNG, THOMAS · 2011 to 2012
$815k
FDA HHS U01FD004230NCATS NIH HHS 1U18TR000547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This project aims to establish and characterize an in vitro model of the developing human brain for the purpose of testing drugs and chemicals. To accurately assess risk, a model needs to recapitulate the complex interactions between different types of glial cells and neurons in a three-dimensional platform. Moreover, human cells are preferred over cells from rodents to eliminate cross-species differences in sensitivity to chemicals. Previously, we established conditions to culture rat primary cells as three-dimensional aggregates, which will be humanized and evaluated here with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The use of iPSCs allows us to address gene/environment interactions as well as the potential of chemicals to interfere with epigenetic mechanisms. Additionally, iPSCs afford us the opportunity to study the effect of chemicals during very early stages of brain development. It is well recognized that assays for testing toxicity in the developing brain must consider differences in sensitivity and susceptibility that arise depending on the time of exposure. This model will reflect critical developmental processes such as proliferation, differentiation, lineage specification, migration, axonal growth, dendritic arborization and synaptogenesis, which will probably display differences in sensitivity to different types of chemicals. Functional endpoints will evaluate the complex cell-to-cell interactions that are affected in neurodevelopment through chemical perturbation, and the efficacy of drug intervention to prevent or reverse phenotypes. The model described is designed to assess developmental neurotoxicity effects on unique processes occurring during human brain development by leveraging human iPSCs from diverse genetic backgrounds, which can be differentiated into different cell types of the central nervous system. Our goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of the personalized model using iPSCs derived from individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders caused by known mutations and chromosomal aberrations. Notably, such a human brain model will be a versatile tool for more complex testing platforms and strategies as well as research into central nervous system physiology and pathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, BiologicalNeural Stem CellsNeuronsXenobioticsXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID24564953
PMCPMC4029162
OpenAlexW2113851821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.