ArticleProteome science2013
A combined approach for genome wide protein function annotation/prediction.
Article in Proteome science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An NLP-based method to mine gene and function relationships from published articles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Self-assembled peptide and protein nanostructures for anti-cancer therapy: Targeted delivery, stimuli-responsive devices and immunotherapy.Nano today · 2021Article
- A three-way approach for protein function classification.PloS one · 2017Article
- Interspecies gene function prediction using semantic similarity.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Large-scale identification of human protein function using topological features of interaction network.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Multi-omic data integration and analysis using systems genomics approaches: methods and applications in animal production, health and welfare.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Review
- Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Models for Identifying Inherited Diseases: Challenges and Implications.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Review
- Editorial: Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins: systems biology approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins- challenges.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Genetic resources for advanced biofuel production described with the Gene Ontology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundToday large scale genome sequencing technologies are uncovering an increasing amount of new genes and proteins, which remain uncharacterized. Experimental procedures for protein function prediction are low throughput by nature and thus can't be used to keep up with the rate at which new proteins are discovered. On the other hand, proteins are the prominent stakeholders in almost all biological processes, and therefore the need to precisely know their functions for a better understanding of the underlying biological mechanism is inevitable. The challenge of annotating uncharacterized proteins in functional genomics and biology in general motivates the use of computational techniques well orchestrated to accurately predict their functions.
methodsWe propose a computational flow for the functional annotation of a protein able to assign the most probable functions to a protein by aggregating heterogeneous information. Considered information include: protein motifs, protein sequence similarity, and protein homology data gathered from interacting proteins, combined with data from highly similar non-interacting proteins (hereinafter called Similactors). Moreover, to increase the predictive power of our model we also compute and integrate term specific relationships among functional terms based on Gene Ontology (GO).
resultsWe tested our method on Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Homo sapiens species proteins. The aggregation of different structural and functional evidence with GO relationships outperforms, in terms of precision and accuracy of prediction than the other methods reported in literature. The predicted precision and accuracy is 100% for more than half of the input set for both species; overall, we obtained 85.38% precision and 81.95% accuracy for Homo sapiens and 79.73% precision and 80.06% accuracy for Saccharomyces Cerevisiae species proteins.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.