Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564836›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2013

Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review.

Sarah Haroon, Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Aamer Imdad, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03688217 (The Philani Mobile Video Intervention for Exclusive Breastfeeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 155 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03688217 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Philani Mobile Video Intervention for Exclusive Breastfeeding (MOVIE) Study: a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Video Entertainment-education Intervention to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding in South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles G. ProberRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,504ConditionsExclusive Breastfeeding, Infant Feeding PracticesArmsPhilani Intervention Model+MOVIE (PIM+M), Philani Intervention Model (PIM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Breastfeeding interventions for preventing postpartum depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. The association between psychological factors and breastfeeding behaviour in women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg mObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2018
    Pooled it
  16. BUNDLE OF MEASURES TO SUPPORT INTRAHOSPITAL EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING: EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo
    Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah Haroon
Jai K Das
Rehana A Salam
Aamer Imdad
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Aga Khan University · PKSickKids Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) rates remain low in both low-income and high-income countries despite World Health Organization recommendations for EBF till 6 months. Breastfeeding has been shown to have a protective effect against gastrointestinal infections, among other benefits. Large-scale interventions focusing on educating mothers about breastfeeding have the potential to increase breastfeeding prevalence, especially EBF, up to recommended standards and also to decrease infant morbidity.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted for RCTs and quasi-experimental studies comparing breastfeeding education or support to routine care. The effect of interventions was observed for exclusive, predominant, partial and no breastfeeding rates. The time intervals of interest were day 1, <1 month, and 1 to 5 months. Outcome-specific evidence was graded according to the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) rules using the adapted Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria and recommendations were made from studies in developing countries for inclusion into the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model.

resultsAfter reviewing 4600 abstracts, 372 studies were selected for full text screening and 110 of these studies were finally included. Statistically significant increases in EBF rates as a result of breastfeeding promotion interventions were observed: 43% at day 1, 30% at <1 month, and 90% at 1-5 months. Rates of 'no breastfeeding' reduced by 32% at 1 day, 30% at <1 month, and 18% at 1-5 months. The effect of interventions on the rates of predominant and partial breastfeeding were non-significant.

conclusionBreastfeeding education and/or support increased EBF rates and decreased no breastfeeding rates at birth, <1 month and 1-5 months. Combined individual and group counseling appeared to be superior to individual or group counseling alone. Interventions in developing countries had a greater impact than those in developed countries.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBreast FeedingDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMaternal BehaviorMothersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID24564836
PMCPMC3847366
OpenAlexW2095348857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.