Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564770›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2013

Time to initiation of breastfeeding and neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review.

Amanda K Debes, Anjalee Kohli, Neff Walker, Karen Edmond, Luke C Mullany

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05292924 (Immediate vs Early Skin-to-skin Contact in Cesarean Births and Its Effect on Breastfeeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 166 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292924 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Immediate vs Early Skin-to-skin Contact in Cesarean Births and Its Effect on Breastfeeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociación Mexicana de Salud PrimalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled280ConditionsBreastfeeding, Exclusive, Mother-Child Relations, Kangaroo-mother CareArmsEarly SCC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Determinants of neonatal morbidity in Rajshahi Division of Bangladesh.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda K Debes
Anjalee Kohli
Neff Walker
Karen Edmond
Luke C Mullany
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly breastfeeding is defined as the initiation of breastfeeding within twenty four hours of birth. While the benefits of breastfeeding have been known for decades, only recently has the role of time to initiation of breastfeeding in neonatal mortality and morbidity been assessed.

objectiveTo review the evidence for early breastfeeding initiation practices and to estimate the association between timing and neonatal outcomes.

methodsWe systematically reviewed multiple databases from 1963 to 2011. Standardized abstraction tables were used and quality was assessed for each study utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Three meta-analyses were conducted for mortality among babies surviving to 48 hours.

resultsWe identified 18 studies reporting a direct association between early breastfeeding initiation and neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes. The results of random effects analyses of data from 3 studies (from 5 publications) demonstrated lower risks of all-cause neonatal mortality among all live births (RR = 0.56 [95% CI: 0.40 - 0.79]) and among low birth weight babies (RR=0.58 [95% CI: 0.43 - 0.78]), and infection-related neonatal mortality (RR = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.36 - 0.84]). Among exclusively breastfed infants, all-cause mortality risk did not differ between early and late initiators (RR = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.27 - 1.75]).

conclusionsThis review demonstrates that early breastfeeding initiation is a simple intervention that has the potential to significantly improve neonatal outcomes and should be universally recommended. Significant gaps in knowledge are highlighted, revealing a need to prioritize additional high quality studies that further clarify the specific cause of death, as well as providing improved understanding of the independent or combined effects of early initiation and breastfeeding patterns.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBreast FeedingHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant WelfareTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24564770
PMCPMC3847227
OpenAlexW2065611810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.