ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Identifying conserved protein complexes between species by constructing interolog networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Immunoprecipitation-Coupled Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Zyxin's Interactome and Phosphosites in EarlyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The protein interactome of the citrus Huanglongbing pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Comparison of the central human and mouse platelet signaling cascade by systems biological analysis.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- MiR-93/miR-375: Diagnostic Potential, Aggressiveness Correlation and Common Target Genes in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Genotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles: anToxicology research · 2019Article
- IMMAN: an R/Bioconductor package for Interolog protein network reconstruction, mapping and mining analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Systematic tracking of altered modules identifies the key biomarkers involved in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Systematic module approach identifies altered genes and pathways in four types of ovarian cancer.Molecular medicine reports · 2017Article
- Protein complex prediction for large protein protein interaction networks with the Core&Peel method.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- A proteomics approach reveals molecular manipulators of distinct cellular processes in the salivary glands of Glossina m. morsitans in response to Trypanosoma b. brucei infections.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Inferring synthetic lethal interactions from mutual exclusivity of genetic events in cancer.Biology direct · 2015Article
- Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2015Article
- Network and matrix analysis of the respiratory disease interactome.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein complexes conserved across species indicate processes that are core to cellular machinery (e.g. cell-cycle or DNA damage-repair complexes conserved across human and yeast). While numerous computational methods have been devised to identify complexes from the protein interaction (PPI) networks of individual species, these are severely limited by noise and errors (false positives) in currently available datasets. Our analysis using human and yeast PPI networks revealed that these methods missed several important complexes including those conserved between the two species (e.g. the MLH1-MSH2-PMS2-PCNA mismatch-repair complex). Here, we note that much of the functionalities of yeast complexes have been conserved in human complexes not only through sequence conservation of proteins but also of critical functional domains. Therefore, integrating information of domain conservation might throw further light on conservation patterns between yeast and human complexes.
resultsWe identify conserved complexes by constructing an interolog network (IN) leveraging on the functional conservation of proteins between species through domain conservation (from Ensembl) in addition to sequence similarity. We employ 'state-of-the-art' methods to cluster the interolog network, and map these clusters back to the original PPI networks to identify complexes conserved between the species. Evaluation of our IN-based approach (called COCIN) on human and yeast interaction data identifies several additional complexes (76% recall) compared to direct complex detection from the original PINs (54% recall). Our analysis revealed that the IN-construction removes several non-conserved interactions many of which are false positives, thereby improving complex prediction. In fact removing non-conserved interactions from the original PINs also resulted in higher number of conserved complexes, thereby validating our IN-based approach. These complexes included the mismatch repair complex, MLH1-MSH2-PMS2-PCNA, and other important ones namely, RNA polymerase-II, EIF3 and MCM complexes, all of which constitute core cellular processes known to be conserved across the two species.
conclusionsOur method based on integrating domain conservation and sequence similarity to construct interolog networks helps to identify considerably more conserved complexes between the PPI networks from two species compared to direct complex prediction from the PPI networks. We observe from our experiments that protein complexes are not conserved from yeast to human in a straightforward way, that is, it is not the case that a yeast complex is a (proper) sub-set of a human complex with a few additional proteins present in the human complex. Instead complexes have evolved multifold with considerable re-organization of proteins and re-distribution of their functions across complexes. This finding can have significant implications on attempts to extrapolate other kinds of relationships such as synthetic lethality from yeast to human, for example in the identification of novel cancer targets. AVAILABILITY: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~leonghw/COCIN/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.