Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564699›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2014

Cellular phenotype and extracellular vesicles: basic and clinical considerations.

Peter J Quesenberry, Laura R Goldberg, Jason M Aliotta, Mark S Dooner, Mandy G Pereira, Sicheng Wen, Giovanni Camussi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Extracellular Vesicles in Acute Kidney Injury and Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Extracellular Vesicles in Modifying the Effects of Ionizing Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter J Quesenberry1 Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital , Providence, Rhode Island.
Laura R Goldberg
Jason M Aliotta
Mark S Dooner
Mandy G Pereira
Sicheng Wen
Giovanni Camussi
Rhode Island Hospital · USUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Regulation of renal and bone marrow injury by extracellular vesicle non-coding RNUH3TR000880 · NCATS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI QUESENBERRY, PETER J. · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
Regulation of renal and bone marrow injury by extracellular vesicle non-coding RNUH2TR000880 · NCATS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI QUESENBERRY, PETER J. · 2013 to 2014
$498k
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000880NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early work on platelet and erythrocyte vesicles interpreted the phenomena as a discard of material from cells. Subsequently, vesicles were studied as possible vaccines and, most recently, there has been a focus on the effects of vesicles on cell fate. Recent studies have indicated that extracellular vesicles, previously referred to as microvesicles or exosomes, have the capacity to change the phenotype of neighboring cells. Extensive work has shown that vesicles derived from either the lung or liver can enter bone marrow cells (this is a prerequisite) and alter their fate toward that of the originating liver and lung tissue. Lung vesicles interacted with bone marrow cells result in the bone marrow cells expressing surfactants A-D, Clara cell protein, and aquaporin-5 mRNA. In a similar vein, liver-derived vesicles induce albumin mRNA in target marrow cells. The vesicles contain protein, mRNA, microRNA, and noncoding RNA and variably some DNA. This genetic package is delivered to cells and alters the phenotype. Further studies have shown that initially the altered phenotype is due to the transfer of mRNA and a transcriptional modulator, but long-term epigenetic changes are induced through transfer of a transcriptional factor, and the mRNA is rapidly degraded in the cell. Studies on the capacity of vesicles to restore injured tissue have been quite informative. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived vesicles are able to reverse the injury to the damaged liver and kidney. Other studies have shown that mesenchymal stem cell-derived vesicles can reverse radiation toxicity of bone marrow stem cells. Extracellular vesicles offer an intriguing strategy for treating a number of diseases characterized by tissue injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesExosomesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsParacrine CommunicationPhenotypeRNA, MessengerRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24564699
PMCPMC4066231
OpenAlexW2007165528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.