ArticleBMC genomics2014
Concordant integrative gene set enrichment analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathway Association Studies Reveal Gene Loci and Pathway Networks that Associated With Plasma Cystatin C Levels.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Gene set enrichment analysis and meta-analysis identified 12 key genes regulating and controlling the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Detecting discordance enrichment among a series of two-sample genome-wide expression data sets.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Differential correlation for sequencing data.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- The discordant method: a novel approach for differential correlation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Diagnostic biases in translational bioinformatics.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
- Associations between DNA methylation and schizophrenia-related intermediate phenotypes - a gene set enrichment analysis.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2015Article
- Vitamin D receptor and RXR in the post-genomic era.Journal of cellular physiology · 2015Review
- The ETS family member GABPα modulates androgen receptor signalling and mediates an aggressive phenotype in prostate cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Vitamin D and the RNA transcriptome: more than mRNA regulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is an important approach to the analysis of coordinate expression changes at a pathway level. Although many statistical and computational methods have been proposed for GSEA, the issue of a concordant integrative GSEA of multiple expression data sets has not been well addressed. Among different related data sets collected for the same or similar study purposes, it is important to identify pathways or gene sets with concordant enrichment.
methodsWe categorize the underlying true states of differential expression into three representative categories: no change, positive change and negative change. Due to data noise, what we observe from experiments may not indicate the underlying truth. Although these categories are not observed in practice, they can be considered in a mixture model framework. Then, we define the mathematical concept of concordant gene set enrichment and calculate its related probability based on a three-component multivariate normal mixture model. The related false discovery rate can be calculated and used to rank different gene sets.
resultsWe used three published lung cancer microarray gene expression data sets to illustrate our proposed method. One analysis based on the first two data sets was conducted to compare our result with a previous published result based on a GSEA conducted separately for each individual data set. This comparison illustrates the advantage of our proposed concordant integrative gene set enrichment analysis. Then, with a relatively new and larger pathway collection, we used our method to conduct an integrative analysis of the first two data sets and also all three data sets. Both results showed that many gene sets could be identified with low false discovery rates. A consistency between both results was also observed. A further exploration based on the KEGG cancer pathway collection showed that a majority of these pathways could be identified by our proposed method.
conclusionsThis study illustrates that we can improve detection power and discovery consistency through a concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample gene expression data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.