Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564548›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Identification of gene fusions from human lung cancer mass spectrometry data.

Han Sun, Xiaobin Xing, Jing Li, Fengli Zhou, Yunqin Chen, Ying He, Wei Li, Guangwu Wei, Xiao Chang, Jia Jia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Identification of gene fusion events inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Structural Characterization of Tumor Fusion Genes and Proteins.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Han Sun
Xiaobin Xing
Jing Li
Fengli Zhou
Yunqin Chen
Ying He
Wei Li
Guangwu Wei
Xiao Chang
Jia Jia
Yixue Li
Lu Xie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) technology has been applied to identify proteins, as an ultimate approach to confirm the original genome annotation. To be able to identify gene fusion proteins, a special database containing peptides that cross over gene fusion breakpoints is needed.

methodsIt is impractical to construct a database that includes all possible fusion peptides originated from potential breakpoints. Focusing on 6259 reported and predicted gene fusion pairs from ChimerDB 2.0 and Cancer Gene Census, we for the first time created a database CanProFu that comprehensively annotates fusion peptides formed by exon-exon linkage between these pairing genes.

resultsApplying this database to mass spectrometry datasets of 40 human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples and 39 normal lung samples with stringent searching criteria, we were able to identify 19 unique fusion peptides characterizing gene fusion events. Among them 11 gene fusion events were only found in NSCLC samples. And also, 4 alternative splicing events were characterized in cancerous or normal lung samples.

conclusionsThe database and workflow in this work can be flexibly applied to other MS/MS based human cancer experiments to detect gene fusions as potential disease biomarkers or drug targets.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatabases, GeneticGene FusionHumansLungLung NeoplasmsOncogene FusionOncogene Proteins, FusionPeptidesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTandem Mass SpectrometryOncogene Proteins, FusionPeptidesRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24564548
PMCPMC4042237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.