Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24564204›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

A pilot study of FDG PET/CT detects a link between brown adipose tissue and breast cancer.

Qi Cao, Jerome Hersl, Hongloan La, Mark Smith, Jason Jenkins, Olga Goloubeva, Vasken Dilsizian, Katherine Tkaczuk, Wengen Chen, Laundette Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brown Adipose Tissue in Breast Cancer Evaluated by [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brown adipose tissue activity on PET/CT and the course of Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Brown fat activation demonstrated on FDG PET/CT predicts survival outcome.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2019
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi Cao
Jerome Hersl
Hongloan La
Mark Smith
Jason Jenkins
Olga Goloubeva
Vasken Dilsizian
Katherine Tkaczuk
Wengen ChenDepartments of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 21201 Baltimore, MD, USA. wchen5@umm.edu.
Laundette Jones
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Plasticity of Mammary Adipose and Breast Cancer DevelopmentR21CA167268 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JONES, LAUNDETTE P · 2012 to 2013
$357k
NCI NIH HHS CA167268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the second most lethal cancer in women. Understanding biological mechanisms that cause progression of this disease could yield new targets for prevention and treatment. Recent experimental studies suggest that brown adipose tissue (BAT) may play a key role in breast cancer progression. The primary objective for this pilot study was to determine if the prevalence of active BAT in patients with breast cancer is increased compared to cancer patients with other malignancies.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 96 breast cancer patients who had FDG PET/CT scan for routine staging at the University of Maryland and 96 age- and weight-matched control female patients with other malignancies (predominantly colon cancer) who had undergone FDG PET/CT imaging on the same day. Data on the distribution (bilateral upper neck, supraclavicular and paraspinal regions) and intensity (SUVmax) of active BAT were evaluated by 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians, blinded to the clinical history.

resultsWe found sufficient evidence to conclude that based on our sample data the prevalence of active BAT in breast cancer patients' group is significantly different from that in the control group. The estimated frequency of BAT activity was 3 fold higher in breast cancer patients as compared to controls with other cancers, (16.7% vs. 5.2%, respectively, p = 0.019). When patients were stratified by age in order to determine the possible impact of age related hormonal changes on active BAT among the younger women (≤ 55 years of age), 25.6% breast cancer patients exhibited BAT activity compared to only 2.8% in control women (p = 0.007). In contrast, among the older women (> 55 years of age), the prevalence of active BAT was similar among breast cancer and control women (10.7% vs 6.7%).

conclusionsIn breast cancer patients prevalence of BAT activity on FDGPET/CT is 3-fold greater than in age- and body weight-matched patients with other solid tumor malignancies; this difference is particularly striking among younger women aged < =55. In summary, our retrospective clinical data provide support to pursue prospective clinical and translational studies to further define the role of BAT in breast cancer development and progression.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyAdipose Tissue, BrownAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID24564204
PMCPMC3937456
OpenAlexW2032520832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.