Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24563641›Full record

ReviewAnnals of burns and fire disasters2013

Fungal infections in burns: a comprehensive review.

M F Struck, J Gille

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Research advances on invasive fungal infections after burns].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Mouse Models of Mucormycosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Voriconazole and Posaconazole Dosing in Patients With Thermal Burn Injuries.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. World journal of plastic surgery · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Animal Models to Study Mucormycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M F StruckDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
J GilleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Burn Center, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn wound infections remain the most important factor limiting survival in burn intensive care units. Large wound surface, impaired immune systems, and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy contribute to the growth of opportunistic fungal species. Faced with challenging fluid resuscitation, wound excision and cardiopulmonary stabilization, mycosis in burns are likely to be underestimated. Diagnostic performance can sometimes be delayed because clinical signs are unspecific and differentiation between colonization and infection is difficult. Therapeutic measures range from infection prophylaxis over treatment with antifungal agents towards radical amputation of infected limbs. New methods of early and reliable detection of fungal organisms, as well as the use of novel antifungal substances, are promising but require wider establishment to confirm the beneficial effects in burn patients. This review aims to highlight the main important aspects of fungal infections in burns including incidence, infection control, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, prognosis and outcomes.

Indexed as

burn intensive careburnsfungal infection

Identifiers

PMID24563641
PMCPMC3917146
OpenAlexW49820269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.