ArticleEvolutionary ecology2014
Rapid evolution of reduced receptivity to interspecific mating in the dengue vector
Article in Evolutionary ecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A tiger is not always a satyr: role of male mating behaviour in interspecific mating interactions between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Differences in maleiScience · 2024Article
- RevisitingEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Neurobiology and Changing Ecosystems: Mechanisms Underlying Responses to Human-Generated Environmental Impacts.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Developing Wolbachia-based disease interventions for an extreme environment.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Interspecific mating bias may drivePNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Article
- Demonstration of resistance to satyrization behavior in Aedes aegypti from La Réunion island.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2020Article
- Competition and growth among Aedes aegypti larvae: Effects of distributing food inputs over time.PloS one · 2020Article
- Patterns of genetic divergence among populations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the southeastern USA.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Article
- Where Vectors Collide: The Importance of Mechanisms Shaping the Realized Niche for Modeling Ranges of InvasiveBiological invasions · 2018Article
- Laboratory colonization of the European invasive mosquito Aedes (Finlaya) koreicus.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Mosquitoes host communities of bacteria that are essential for development but vary greatly between local habitats.Molecular ecology · 2016Article
- Evolutionary biology and genetic techniques for insect control.Evolutionary applications · 2016Review
- Widespread evidence for interspecific mating between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nature.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2015Article
- The Effects of Interspecific Courtship on the Mating Success ofAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2015Article
- Evidence that implicit assumptions of 'no evolution' of disease vectors in changing environments can be violated on a rapid timescale.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper we examine the effect of reproductive interference on the dynamics of two mosquito vectors of public health concern and add to the growing literature on the strength and speed with which interspecific reproductive interference may drive evolution. Recent evidence supports a role for asymmetric reproductive interference, or satyrization, in competitive displacements of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.