ReviewJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2014
Standardizing scavenger receptor nomenclature.
Review in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 199 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- High-density lipoprotein mediates silica nanoparticle recognition by the multiligand receptor SR-B1.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Endothelial GATAD1 Exacerbates Blood-brain Barrier Dysfunction in Ischemic Stroke through Caveolae-mediated Transcytosis.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Emerging technologies in poultry genomics: Unlocking innovation for the future of sustainable production.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics of Pacific white shrimp (Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Serum Homocysteine as a Potential Dynamic Biomarker for Staging and Monitoring Progression in Alzheimer's Disease.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- AFM reveals differential effects of acidification on LDL- and oxidized LDL-receptor interactions: biomechanical implications in atherogenesis.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Article
- Class B scavenger receptor resists WSSV replication by recognizing the viral lipid molecule and promoting phagocytosis.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Dual-mode-driven nanomotors targeting inflammatory macrophages for the MRI and synergistic treatment of atherosclerosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Scavenger receptors: key players in the immunological puzzle of lupus.Frontiers in lupus · 2025Article
- Standardized Gene Nomenclature for Chicken Scavenger Receptors.microPublication biology · 2025Article
- Cross one single body 49 tissues single-cell transcriptome reveals detailed macrophage heterogeneity during pig pregnancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Class A1 scavenger receptor antibody improves murine colitis by influencing macrophage and gut microbiota.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Leishmania major drives host phagocyte death and cell-to-cell transfer depending on intracellular pathogen proliferation rate.JCI insight · 2023Article
- Exploring scavenger receptor class F member 2 and the importance of scavenger receptor family in prediagnostic diseases.Toxicological research · 2023Review
- Immunomodulatory Effect and Biological Significance of β-Glucans.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Functional consequences of brain exposure to saturated fatty acids: From energy metabolism and insulin resistance to neuronal damage.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2023Review
- Immune functions of pattern recognition receptors in Lepidoptera.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Review
- tRNA-like Transcripts from theCells · 2022Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Scavenger receptors constitute a large family of proteins that are structurally diverse and participate in a wide range of biological functions. These receptors are expressed predominantly by myeloid cells and recognize a variety of ligands, including endogenous and modified host-derived molecules and microbial pathogens. There are currently eight classes of scavenger receptors, many of which have multiple names, leading to inconsistencies and confusion in the literature. To address this problem, a workshop was organized by the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health to help develop a clear definition of scavenger receptors and a standardized nomenclature based on that definition. Fifteen experts in the scavenger receptor field attended the workshop and, after extensive discussion, reached a consensus regarding the definition of scavenger receptors and a proposed scavenger receptor nomenclature. Scavenger receptors were defined as cell surface receptors that typically bind multiple ligands and promote the removal of non-self or altered-self targets. They often function by mechanisms that include endocytosis, phagocytosis, adhesion, and signaling that ultimately lead to the elimination of degraded or harmful substances. Based on this definition, nomenclature and classification of these receptors into 10 classes were proposed. The discussion and nomenclature recommendations described in this report only refer to mammalian scavenger receptors. The purpose of this article is to describe the proposed mammalian nomenclature and classification developed at the workshop and to solicit additional feedback from the broader research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.