Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24563252›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2014

Distinct conformations of the chemokine receptor CCR4 with implications for its targeting in allergy.

Jonathan M Viney, David P Andrew, Rhian M Phillips, Andrea Meiser, Pallavi Patel, Melissa Lennartz-Walker, David J Cousins, Nicholas P Barton, David A Hall, James E Pease

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CC Chemokine Receptor 4 (CCR4) as a Possible New Target for Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Skin-resident dendritic cells mediate postoperative pain via CCR4 on sensory neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evidence for the Existence of a CXCL17 Receptor Distinct from GPR35.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. RNA Aptamers Recognizing Murine CCL17 Inhibit T Cell Chemotaxis and Reduce Contact Hypersensitivity In Vivo.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan M VineyLeukocyte Biology Section, Medical Research Council-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;
David P Andrew
Rhian M Phillips
Andrea Meiser
Pallavi Patel
Melissa Lennartz-Walker
David J Cousins
Nicholas P Barton
David A Hall
James E Pease
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBMedical Research Council · GBKing's College London · GBAsthma UK · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000758Wellcome Trust 068226Wellcome Trust 068226/Z/02/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is expressed by Th2 and regulatory T cells and directs their migration along gradients of the chemokines CCL17 and CCL22. Both chemokines and receptor are upregulated in allergic disease, making CCR4 a therapeutic target for the treatment of allergy. We set out to assess the mechanisms underlying a previous report that CCL22 is a dominant ligand of CCR4, which may have implications for its therapeutic targeting. Human T cells expressing endogenous CCR4 and transfectants engineered to express CCR4 were assessed for receptor function, using assays of calcium release, chemotaxis, receptor endocytosis, and ligand binding. Despite the two ligands having equal potency in calcium flux and chemotaxis assays, CCL22 showed dominance in both receptor endocytosis assays and heterologous competitive binding assays. Using two different CCR4-specific Abs, we showed that CCR4 exists in at least two distinct conformations, which are differentially activated by ligand. A major population is activated by both CCL17 and CCL22, whereas a minor population is activated only by CCL22. Mutation of a single C-terminal residue K310 within a putative CCR4 antagonist binding site ablated activation of CCR4 by CCL17, but not by CCL22, despite having no effect on the binding of either ligand. We conclude that CCL17 and CCL22 are conformationally selective ligands of CCR4 and interact with the receptor by substantially different mechanisms. This finding suggests that the selective blockade of CCR4 in allergy may be feasible when one CCR4 ligand dominates, allowing the inhibition of Th2 signaling via one ligand while sparing regulatory T cell recruitment via another.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCell Line, TumorCell MovementChemokine CCL17Chemokine CCL22Chemotaxis, LeukocyteEndocytosisFlow CytometryHumansHypersensitivityLymphocyte ActivationMiceModels, MolecularMutationProtein BindingCalciumCCL17 protein, humanCCL22 protein, humanChemokine CCL17Chemokine CCL22Receptors, CCR4

Identifiers

PMID24563252
PMCPMC3965571
OpenAlexW2108452978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.