Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24563018›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2014

Vascular neural network: the importance of vein drainage in stroke.

Qian Li, Nikan Khatibi, John H Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Argatroban Increased the Basal Vein Drainage and Improved Outcomes in Acute Paraventricular Ischemic Stroke Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Recanalization, reperfusion, and recirculation in stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian LiDepartment of Neurology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400062.
Nikan Khatibi
John H Zhang

Funding

Vascular Biology Core FacilityP01NS082184 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI PEARCE, WILLIAM J. · 2014 to 2018
$6.1M
Neurovascular Protection for Early Brain Injury after SAHR01NS081740 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JOHN H · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS082184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective commentary summarized the stroke pathophysiology evolution, especially the focus in the past on neuroprotection and neurovascular protection and highlighted the newer term for stroke pathophysiology: vascular neural network. Emphasis is on the role of venules and veins after an acute stroke and as potential treatment targets. Vein drainage may contribute to the acute phase of brain edema and the outcomes of stroke patients.

Indexed as

BrainBrain IschemiaHumansStroke

Identifiers

PMID24563018
PMCPMC3985555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.