Trial reportClinical orthopaedics and related research2014
Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty?
Trial report in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine approach for patient follow-up after total knee and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a pilot study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Trial
- Assessing Telemedicine Efficiency in Follow-up Care With Video Consultations for Patients in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery in Germany: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Duloxetine reduces pain after Total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Trial
- Preoperative Physical Therapy Education Reduces Time to Meet Functional Milestones After Total Joint Arthroplasty.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Trial
- Review
- Patient Perceptions Regarding Clinical Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Mobile and Computer-Based Applications for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Self-Management After Knee Arthroplasty: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Disruptions in Standard Care in Patients After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Despite Equivalent Clinical Outcomes, Patients Report Less Satisfaction With Telerehabilitation Versus Standard In-Office Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Survey of the Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Liver Disease Patient Care Experiences and Outcomes.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Telemedicine Technologies Selection for the Posthospital Patient Care Process after Total Hip Arthroplasty.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Telehealth Visits After Shoulder Surgery: Higher Patient Satisfaction and Lower Costs.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine follow-up for hip fracture patients after dynamic hip screw and intramedullary nail fixation.Surgery in practice and science · 2022Article
- Spine Patient Satisfaction With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Patient satisfaction in shoulder arthroscopy: telemedicine vs. clinic follow-up visits.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2022Article
- Remote Follow-up of Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic - Is This the way Forward?Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2022Article
- The Spine Physical Examination Using Telemedicine: Strategies and Best Practices.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: Influencing factors.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Telemedicine Versus In-Person Visits in Postoperative Care in Orthopedic Patients: Follow-Up Study From North India.Cureus · 2021Article
- The Delivery of Orthopaedic Care midst COVID-19 and Social Distancing.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA web-based followup assessment may be a feasible, cost-saving alternative of tracking patient outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. However, before implementing a web-based program, it is important to determine patient satisfaction levels with the new followup method. Satisfaction with the care received is becoming an increasingly important metric, and we do not know to what degree patients are satisfied with an approach to followup that does not involve an in-person visit with their surgeons. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) patient satisfaction and (2) patients' preferences for followup method (web-based or in-person) after total joint arthroplasty.
methodsWe randomized patients who were at least 12 months after primary THA or TKA to complete a web-based followup or to have their appointment at the clinic. There were 410 eligible patients contacted for the study during the recruitment period. Of these, 256 agreed to participate, and a total of 229 patients completed the study (89% of those enrolled, 56% of those potentially eligible; 111 in the usual-care group, 118 in the web-based group). Their mean age was 69 years (range, 38-86 years). There was no crossover between groups. All 229 patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at the time of their followup appointments. Patients in the web-based group also completed a satisfaction and preference questionnaire 1 year later. Only patients from the web-based group were asked to indicate preference as they had experienced the web-based and in-person followup methods. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the satisfaction questionnaires and compared results using Pearson's chi-square test.
resultsNinety-one patients (82.0%) in the usual-care group indicated that they were either extremely or very satisfied with the followup process compared with 90 patients (75.6%) who were in the web-based group (p < 0.01; odds ratio [OR] = 3.95; 95% CI, 1.79-8.76). Similarly, patients in the usual care group were more satisfied with the care they received from their surgeon, compared with patients in the web-based group (92.8% versus 73.9%; p < 0.01, OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.73-2.57). Forty-four percent of patients preferred the web-based method, 36% preferred the usual method, and 16% had no preference (p = 0.01).
conclusionsOur results show moderate to high satisfaction levels with a web-based followup assessment. Patients who completed the usual method of in-person followup assessment reported greater satisfaction; however, the difference was small and may not outweigh the additional cost and time-saving benefits of the web-based followup method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.