ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2014
Nanomechanics of β-rich proteins related to neuronal disorders studied by AFM, all-atom and coarse-grained MD methods.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mathematical model of mechanobiology of acute and repeated synaptic injury and systemic biomarker kinetics.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Entropic bonding of the type 1 pilus from experiment and simulation.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Dynamics, nanomechanics and signal transduction in reelin repeats.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Nanomechanics of multidomain neuronal cell adhesion protein contactin revealed by single molecule AFM and SMD.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer simulations of protein unfolding substantially help to interpret force-extension curves measured in single-molecule atomic force microscope (AFM) experiments. Standard all-atom (AA) molecular dynamics simulations (MD) give a good qualitative mechanical unfolding picture but predict values too large for the maximum AFM forces with the common pulling speeds adopted here. Fine tuned coarse-grain MD computations (CG MD) offer quantitative agreement with experimental forces. In this paper we address an important methodological aspect of MD modeling, namely the impact of numerical noise generated by random assignments of bead velocities on maximum forces (F(max)) calculated within the CG MD approach. Distributions of CG forces from 2000 MD runs for several model proteins rich in β structures and having folds with increasing complexity are presented. It is shown that F(max) have nearly Gaussian distributions and that values of F(max) for each of those β-structures may vary from 93.2 ± 28.9 pN (neurexin) to 198.3 ± 25.2 pN (fibronectin). The CG unfolding spectra are compared with AA steered MD data and with results of our AFM experiments for modules present in contactin, fibronectin and neurexin. The stability of these proteins is critical for the proper functioning of neuronal synaptic clefts. Our results confirm that CG modeling of a single molecule unfolding is a good auxiliary tool in nanomechanics but large sets of data have to be collected before reliable comparisons of protein mechanical stabilities are made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.