Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24562700›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2014

Early wound healing and patient morbidity after single-incision vs. trap-door graft harvesting from the palate--a clinical study.

Stefan Fickl, Kai R Fischer, Yvonne Jockel-Schneider, Christian F J Stappert, Ulrich Schlagenhauf, Moritz Kebschull

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02935426 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives to Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Sutures in the Donor Site of Connective Tissue Grafts- A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled32ConditionsWound ClosureArmsn-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture
NCT03741062 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Er:YAG Photobiomodulation Therapy on Wound Healing of Human Palatal Mucosa After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled11ConditionsHealing Surgical Wounds, Pain MeasurementArmsJ. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser, Control
NCT04513886 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Healing After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting in the Palatal Area With and Without Suture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMariel Viviana GómezRan2018 to 2019Enrolled36ConditionsWound HealingArmsSubepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) using the single incision technique, with and without suturing the palate
NCT06540690 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Palatal Wound Healing in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients: Controlled Clinical Trial and in Vitro Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoRan2023 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPalate, Wound, Wound Heal, DiabetesArmsPalatal Wound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Outcome measurements following palatal soft tissue graft harvesting: A review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan FicklDepartment of Periodontology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany, fickl_s@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de.
Kai R Fischer
Yvonne Jockel-Schneider
Christian F J Stappert
Ulrich Schlagenhauf
Moritz Kebschull

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare wound healing and patient pain perception of single-incision (single-incision, modified single-incision) and trap-door surgical techniques to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty-six patients were selected for root coverage procedures with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and randomly assigned to two single-incision groups or a trap-door group (n = 12/group). One week after surgery, a modified early-wound healing index (EHI), patient pain and painkiller intake were recorded. Follow-up was performed until complete epithelialization was achieved.

resultsSingle-incision techniques showed significantly improved early healing over trap-door approaches. Specifically, the mean EHI was 2.50 ± 1.14 for single-incision techniques, as compared to 3.33 ± 1.30 for trap door. The incidence of secondary healing was significantly lower in the single-incision groups. Concomitantly, the cumulative dosage and duration of painkiller intake were significantly reduced, as compared to the trap-door group.

conclusionWithin the limits of this trial, single-incision techniques can lead to improved early healing and reduced patient pain after subepithelial connective tissue graft harvesting than trap-door techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Avoiding trap-door incisions for harvesting of connective tissue grafts may reduce patient morbidity.

Indexed as

Connective TissuePalateTissue and Organ HarvestingTooth RootWound HealingAdultAnalgesicsFemaleGingivoplastyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRandom AllocationTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.