ArticleClinical oral investigations2014
Prevention of the surface resorption of bone grafts by topical application of bisphosphonate on different carrier materials.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do topical applications of bisphosphonates improve bone formation in oral implantology? A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2017Pooled it
- Exploring the multifaceted impact of bisphosphonates on bone graft integration: transitioning from in vivo insights to clinical applications.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Comparison of vertical bone resorption following various types of autologous block bone grafts.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
- Which substances loaded onto collagen scaffolds influence oral tissue regeneration?-an overview of the last 15 years.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Review
- The Influence of Local Pamidronate Application on Alveolar Dimensional Preservation after Tooth Extraction-An Animal Experimental Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the autogenous bone block transfer for dental implant placement: Symphysal or ramus harvesting?BMC oral health · 2016Article
- The Effect of Alendronate on Various Graft Materials Used in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Rabbit Study.Iranian Red Crescent medical journal · 2015Article
- The role of gap junctions and mechanical loading on mineral formation in a collagen-I scaffold seeded with osteoprogenitor cells.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe hypothesis of the present study was that topically applied bisphosphonate (BP) on a collagen membrane or alternatively bovine bone mineral prevents surface resorption of onlay bone grafts. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn eight adult pigs, bone blocks were harvested bilaterally from the mandible and fixed to the lateral cortex of the horizontal ramus to simulate a ridge augmentation. In a split-mouth study design, we used alendronate in aqueous solution (1 mg/ml) on the test-side in three different ways: on a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®), soaked in bovine bone mineral granules (Bio-Oss®), or applied to the bone graft directly. The same materials without BP were used as controls on the contralateral side. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed. The evaluation included sequential fluorochromic labeling and measurement of bone height in microradiography and toluidine blue staining.
resultsIn five cases, necrosis of the overlying periosteal tissues with BP was observed macroscopically. A statistically significantly lower loss in graft height was seen on the test-side for Bio-Gide® + alendronate (0.65 %) versus Bio-Gide® (1.52 %), p = 0.002; Bio-Oss® + alendronate (1.16 %) versus Bio-Oss® (4.20 %), p = 0.001; and bone graft + alendronate (1.25 %) versus bone graft alone (6.01 %), p = 0.006. An inhibitory effect on bone remodeling was observed by a statistically significantly lower number of resorption lacunae.
conclusionThe hypothesis was accepted that a bisphosphonate-treated membrane reduced bone graft resorption; however, periosteal necrosis requires better adaptation of the dosage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A bisphosphonate membrane could be a helpful tool to preserve augmentation height of onlay bone grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.