Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24562651›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Prospective evaluation of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with raised thyroglobulin and negative (131)I-whole body scan: comparison with (18)F-FDG PET-CT.

Parveen Kundu, Sneh Lata, Punit Sharma, Harmandeep Singh, Arun Malhotra, Chandrasekhar Bal

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinical Value ofScientific reports · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parveen KunduDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Sneh Lata
Punit Sharma
Harmandeep Singh
Arun Malhotra
Chandrasekhar Bal
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the role of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients with negative (131)I-whole body scan (WBS) along with serially increasing serum thyroglobulin (Tg), and compare the same with (18)F-FDG PET-CT.

methodsSixty two DTC patients with serially rising Tg levels and negative (131)I-WBS were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT and (18)F-FDG PET-CT within an interval of two weeks. PET-CT analysis was done on a per-patient basis, location wise and lesion wise. All PET-CT lesions were divided into four categories-local, nodal, pulmonary and skeletal. Histopathology and/or serial serum Tg level, clinical and imaging follow up (minimum-1 year) were used as a reference standard.

resultsGa-DOTANOC PET-CT demonstrated disease in 40/62 (65 %) patients and (18)F-FDG PET-CT in 45/62 (72 %) patients, with no significant difference on McNemar analysis (p = 0.226). Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT was 78.4 %, 100 %, and for (18)F-FDG PET-CT was 86.3 %, 90.9 %, respectively. Out of 186 lesions detected by both PET-CTs, 121/186 (65 %) lesions were seen on (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT and 168/186 (90.3 %) lesions on (18)F-FDG PET-CT (p < 0.0001). There were 103/186 (55 %) lesions concordant on both. Excellent agreement was noted between (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT and (18)F-FDG PET-CT for detection of local disease (ĸ = 0.92), while moderate agreement was noted for nodal and pulmonary disease (ĸ = 0.67). (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT changed management in 21/62 (34 %) patients and (18)F-FDG PET-CT in 17/62 (27 %) patients.

conclusionGa-DOTANOC PET-CT is inferior to (18)F-FDG PET-CT on lesion based but not on patient based analysis for detection of recurrent/residual disease in DTC patients with negative WBS scan and elevated serum Tg levels. It can also help in selection of potential candidates for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Organometallic CompoundsPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIodine RadioisotopesMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal Imaging68Ga-DOTANOCFluorodeoxyglucose F18Iodine RadioisotopesOrganometallic CompoundsThyroglobulin

Identifiers

PMID24562651
OpenAlexW2065563514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.