Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24562070›Full record

ArticleHealth physics2014

Radiation safety considerations for the use of ²²³RaCl₂ DE in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Lawrence T Dauer, Matthew J Williamson, John Humm, Joseph O'Donoghue, Rashid Ghani, Robert Awadallah, Jorge Carrasquillo, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Anne-Kirsti Aksnes, Colin Biggin and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Health physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biokinetic modelling of the exhalation ofRadiation and environmental biophysics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radium dial workers: back to the future.International journal of radiation biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Intra-articular use of radium dichloride ([European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quantitative measurement ofEJNMMI physics · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. α-Emitters for Radiotherapy: From Basic Radiochemistry to Clinical Studies-Part 1.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Radium 223 dichloride for prostate cancer treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lawrence T Dauer*Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; †Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; ‡Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; §Algeta ASA, Oslo, Norway; **Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; ††Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Matthew J Williamson
John Humm
Joseph O'Donoghue
Rashid Ghani
Robert Awadallah
Jorge Carrasquillo
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Anne-Kirsti Aksnes
Colin Biggin
Vigdis Reinton
Michael Morris
Jean St Germain

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of patients with late stage castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) develop bone metastases that often result in significant bone pain. Therapeutic palliation strategies can delay or prevent skeletal complications and may prolong survival. An alpha-particle based therapy, radium-223 dichloride (²²³RaCl₂), has been developed that delivers highly localized effects in target areas and likely reduces toxicity to adjacent healthy tissue, particularly bone marrow. Radiation safety aspects were evaluated for a single comprehensive cancer center clinical phase 1, open-label, single ascending-dose study for three cohorts at 50, 100, or 200 kBq kg⁻¹ body weight. Ten patients received administrations, and six patients completed the study with 1 y follow-up. Dose rates from patients administered ²²³Ra dichloride were typically less than 2 μSv h⁻¹ MBq⁻¹ on contact and averaged 0.02 μSv h⁻¹ MBq⁻¹ at 1 m immediately following administration. Removal was primarily by fecal excretion, and whole body effective half-lives were highly dependent upon fecal compartment transfer, ranging from 2.5-11.4 d. Radium-223 is safe and straightforward to administer using conventional nuclear medicine equipment. For this clinical study, few radiation protection limitations were recommended post-therapy based on facility evaluations. Specific precautions are dependent on local regulatory authority guidance. Subsequent studies have demonstrated significantly improved overall survival and very low toxicity, suggesting that ²²³Ra may provide a new standard of care for patients with CRPC and bone metastases.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlpha ParticlesAntineoplastic AgentsBody WeightBone and BonesBone NeoplasmsChloridesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRadiation ProtectionRadioisotopesAntineoplastic AgentsChloridesRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiumradium Ra 223 dichloride

Identifiers

PMID24562070
PMCPMC4981573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.