ArticleBioengineered
The synthetic biology future.
Article in Bioengineered. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic changes of intestinal flora in patients with irritable bowel syndrome combined with anxiety and depression after oral administration of enterobacteria capsules.Bioengineered · 2021Trial
- Genome Mining as New Challenge in Natural Products Discovery.Marine drugs · 2020Review
- Synthetic Biology of Natural Products.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016Review
- Advances in the Microbiome: Applications to Clostridium difficile Infection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2016Review
- DIY Biology - hacking goes viral!Science progress · 2016Article
- JCVI-syn3.0 - A synthetic genome stripped bare!Bioengineered · 2016Article
- Under the microscope: From pathogens to probiotics and back.Bioengineered · 2015Review
- The genetic code. Rewritten, revised, repurposed.Artificial DNA, PNA & XNA · 2014Article
- Genetics just got SEXY: Sequences encoding XY.BioengineeredArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, I track the evolution of synthetic biology from its earliest incarnations more than 50 years ago, through the DIYbio revolution, to the next 50 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.