Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24561776›Full record

ReviewSocial science & medicine (1982)2014

Challenges of health measurement in studies of health disparities.

Sarah A Burgard, Patricia V Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social science & medicine (1982), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Association Between Trauma, Instability, and Youth Cardiometabolic Health Outcomes Over Three Years.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Estimating the economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in a multinational study: a real-world data perspective.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The cultural equivalence of measurement in substance use research.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah A BurgardUniversity of Michigan, Department of Sociology, 500 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382, USA. Electronic address: burgards@umich.edu.
Patricia V ChenUniversity of Michigan, Department of Sociology, 500 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382, USA. Electronic address: pvchen@umich.edu.

Funding

Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMOCK, PAMELA J. · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health disparities are increasingly studied in and across a growing array of societies. While novel contexts and comparisons are a promising development, this commentary highlights four challenges to finding appropriate and adequate health measures when making comparisons across groups within a society or across distinctive societies. These challenges affect the accuracy with which we characterize the degree of inequality, limiting possibilities for effectively targeting resources to improve health and reduce disparities. First, comparisons may be challenged by different distributions of disease and second, by variation in the availability and quality of vital events and census data often used to measure health. Third, the comparability of self-reported information about specific health conditions may vary across social groups or societies because of diagnosis bias or diagnosis avoidance. Fourth, self-reported overall health measures or measures of specific symptoms may not be comparable across groups if they use different reference groups or interpret questions or concepts differently. We explain specific issues that make up each type of challenge and show how they may lead to underestimates or inflation of estimated health disparities. We also discuss approaches that have been used to address them in prior research, note where further innovation is needed to solve lingering problems, and make recommendations for improving future research. Many of our examples are drawn from South Africa or the United States, societies characterized by substantial socioeconomic inequality across ethnic groups and wide disparities in many health outcomes, but the issues explored throughout apply to a wide variety of contexts and inquiries.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesHealth Status IndicatorsResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchHumansCross-national comparisonDiagnosis biasHealth disparitiesHealth measurementSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID24561776
PMCPMC4077714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.