Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24561539›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2014

Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation: insights from new model systems.

Matthew P Zuellig, Amanda M Kenney, Andrea L Sweigart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Many Facets of Dynamic Plasticity in Plants.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hybrid apomicts trapped in the ecological niches of their sexual ancestors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew P ZuelligUniversity of Georgia, Department of Genetics, Fred C. Davidson Life Sciences Complex, Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Amanda M KenneyUniversity of Georgia, Department of Genetics, Fred C. Davidson Life Sciences Complex, Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Andrea L SweigartUniversity of Georgia, Department of Genetics, Fred C. Davidson Life Sciences Complex, Athens, GA 30602, United States. Electronic address: sweigart@uga.edu.

Funding

T32 Predoctoral training grant in geneticsT32GM007103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI DYER, KELLY A · 1985 to 2021
$5.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowering time and mating system divergence are two of the most common adaptive transitions in plants. We review recent progress toward understanding the genetic basis of these adaptations in new model plant species. For flowering time, we find that individual crosses often reveal a simple genetic basis, but that the loci involved almost always vary within species and across environments, indicating a more complex genetic basis species-wide. Similarly, the transition to self-fertilization is often genetically complex, but this seems to depend on the amount of standing variation and time since species divergence. Recent population genomic studies also raise doubts about the long-term adaptive potential of self-fertilization, providing evidence that purifying selection is less effective in highly selfing species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalPlantsReproductionSelf-Fertilization

Identifiers

PMID24561539
PMCPMC7659028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.