Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24560558›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2014

Two steps forward, one step back: determining XPD helicase mechanism by single-molecule fluorescence and high-resolution optical tweezers.

Maria Spies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of SF1 and SF2 Helicases in Biotechnological Applications.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of UpregulatedJournal of Cancer · 2019
    Article
  11. The essential and multifunctional TFIIH complex.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Review
  12. Revealing dynamics of helicase translocation on single-stranded DNA using high-resolution nanopore tweezers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria SpiesDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: maria-spies@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Human DNA Replication Machines: Structure-Function of Polymerase Alpha-PrimaseR01GM101167 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAHIROV, TAHIR H · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM101167-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

XPD-like helicases constitute a prominent DNA helicase family critical for many aspects of genome maintenance. These enzymes share a unique structural feature, an auxiliary domain stabilized by an iron-sulphur (FeS) cluster, and a 5'-3' polarity of DNA translocation and duplex unwinding. Biochemical analyses alongside two single-molecule approaches, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and high-resolution optical tweezers, have shown how the unique structural features of XPD helicase and its specific patterns of substrate interactions tune the helicase for its specific cellular function and shape its molecular mechanism. The FeS domain forms a duplex separation wedge and contributes to an extended DNA binding site. Interactions within this site position the helicase in an orientation to unwind the duplex, control the helicase rate, and verify the integrity of the translocating strand. Consistent with its cellular role, processivity of XPD is limited and is defined by an idiosyncratic stepping kinetics. DNA duplex separation occurs in single base pair steps punctuated by frequent backward steps and conformational rearrangements of the protein-DNA complex. As such, the helicase in isolation mainly stabilizes spontaneous base pair opening and exhibits a limited ability to unwind stable DNA duplexes. The presence of a cognate ssDNA binding protein converts XPD into a vigorous helicase by destabilizing the upstream dsDNA as well as by trapping the unwound strands. Remarkably, the two proteins can co-exist on the same DNA strand without competing for binding. The current model of the XPD unwinding mechanism will be discussed along with possible modifications to this mechanism by the helicase interacting partners and unique features of such bio-medically important XPD-like helicases as FANCJ (BACH1), RTEL1 and CHLR1 (DDX11).

Indexed as

Optical TweezersAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesDNA, Single-StrandedHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D ProteinDNA, Single-StrandedXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D ProteinDNA helicasesDNA repairFeS clusterHigh-resolution optical tweezersNucleotide excision repairSingle-moleculeTotal internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM)

Identifiers

PMID24560558
PMCPMC4295835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.