Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24560257›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2014

Gender inequalities in health: exploring the contribution of living conditions in the intersection of social class.

Davide Malmusi, Alejandra Vives, Joan Benach, Carme Borrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health Effects of Happiness in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Gender Equality and Gender Inequalities in Self-Reported Health: A Longitudinal Study of 27 European Countries 2004 to 2016.International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Understanding the Meaning of Conformity to Feminine Norms in Lifestyle Habits and Health: A Cluster Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. The Intersectionality of Gender and Wealth in Adolescent Health and Behavioral Outcomes in Brazil: The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Davide MalmusiCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, IIB-Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Unitat Docent de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública PSMAR-UPF-ASPB, Barcelona, Spain; dmalmusi@aspb.cat.
Alejandra VivesHealth Inequalities Research Group - Employment Conditions Network (GREDS-EMCONET), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Salud Pública, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Joan BenachHealth Inequalities Research Group - Employment Conditions Network (GREDS-EMCONET), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme BorrellCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, IIB-Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen experience poorer health than men despite their longer life expectancy, due to a higher prevalence of non-fatal chronic illnesses. This paper aims to explore whether the unequal gender distribution of roles and resources can account for inequalities in general self-rated health (SRH) by gender, across social classes, in a Southern European population.

methodsCross-sectional study of residents in Catalonia aged 25-64, using data from the 2006 population living conditions survey (n=5,817). Poisson regression models were used to calculate the fair/poor SRH prevalence ratio (PR) by gender and to estimate the contribution of variables assessing several dimensions of living conditions as the reduction in the PR after their inclusion in the model. Analyses were stratified by social class (non-manual and manual).

resultsSRH was poorer for women among both non-manual (PR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76) and manual social classes (PR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.56). Adjustment for individual income alone eliminated the association between sex and SRH, especially among manual classes (PR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.19; among non-manual 1.19, 0.92-1.54). The association was also reduced when adjusting by employment conditions among manual classes, and household material and economic situation, time in household chores and residential environment among non-manual classes. DISCUSSION: Gender inequalities in individual income appear to contribute largely to women's poorer health. Individual income may indicate the availability of economic resources, but also the history of access to the labour market and potentially the degree of independence and power within the household. Policies to facilitate women's labour market participation, to close the gender pay gap, or to raise non-contributory pensions may be helpful to improve women's health.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSocial ClassAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoisson DistributionSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSpaingenderhealth inequalitiesintersectionalitymaterial resourcesself-rated healthsocial class

Identifiers

PMID24560257
PMCPMC3927744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.