Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24559782›Full record

ArticleSeminars in oncology nursing2014

Public health and cooperative group partnership: a colorectal cancer intervention.

Sherri G Homan, Bob R Steward, Jane M Armer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in oncology nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sherri G Homan
Bob R Steward
Jane M Armer
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services · US

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
MO PROGRAMS FUNDED THROUGH: COMPREHENSIVE CANCER, CANCER REGISTRYU58DP003924 · DP · MISSOURI STATE DEPT/ HEALTH & SENIOR SRV · PI HEIMERICKS, BELINDA · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP003924-01ANCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003924NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the development of a multi-component colorectal cancer educational tool for female breast cancer survivors through a cooperative group and public health partnership. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, World Wide Web, guidelines from professional organizations, surveys and focus groups with breast cancer survivors.

conclusionCollaboration is at the core of cooperative group and public health research. This partnership led to the development of a colorectal cancer educational tool for breast cancer survivors. Focus groups revealed that female breast cancer survivors were receptive to education on colorectal cancer screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses are instrumental in research collaborations between cooperative groups and public health. The colorectal educational intervention for breast cancer survivors serves as an exemplar of partnerships leading to innovative research planning and implementation outcomes.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPublic HealthBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPatient Education as TopicCooperative groupEducationHealth disparitiesNeoplasmsPartnershipScreeningSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID24559782
PMCPMC5656249
OpenAlexW1964798980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.