ArticleSystematic reviews2014
Health inequity in access to bariatric surgery: a protocol for a systematic review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- SAGES guidelines for the management of comorbidities relevant to metabolic and bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Patient and Referring Practitioner Characteristics Associated With the Likelihood of Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.JAMA surgery · 2015Pooled it
- Inequity to the utilization of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2015Pooled it
- The association of preoperative psychological assessments with long-term sleeve gastrectomy surgery outcomes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Beliefs About Obesity and Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Among Black and White Men.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- A population based study of bariatric surgery in Illinois.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Marginal ulcers and associated risk factors after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
- Racial disparities in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy for upper GI malignancies.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Association Between Patient Satisfaction With Their Patient-Physician Relationship and Completion of Bariatric Surgery by Race and Ethnicity Among US Adults.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Weight loss dynamics following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. An analysis of 10-year follow-up data.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Patients eligible and referred for bariatric surgery in southeastern Ontario: Retrospective cohort study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021Article
- Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery: A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance.Obesity surgery · 2019Observational
- Is Gastric Banding Appropriate in Indigenous Or Remote-Dwelling Persons?Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Surgical management of super-super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Does Age Influence Bariatric Surgery Outcomes?Bariatric surgical practice and patient care · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBariatric surgery is the only weight-loss treatment available that results in both sustained weight loss and improvements of obesity-related comorbidities. Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery are generally older, come from racial or ethnic minorities, are economically disadvantaged, and have low levels of education. However, the population who actually receives bariatric surgery does not reflect the individuals who need it the most. The objective is to conduct a systematic review of the literature exploring the inequities to the access of bariatric surgery. METHODS/
designEMBASE and Medline databases will be searched for observational studies that compared at least one of the PROGRESS-PLUS sociodemographic characteristics of patients eligible for bariatric surgery to those who actually received the procedure. Articles published in the year 1980 to present with no language restrictions will be included. For inclusion, studies must only include adults (≥18 years old) who meet National Institutes of Health (NIH) eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery defined as having either (1) a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or greater; or (2) BMI of 35 kg/m² or greater with significant weight-related comorbidities. Eligible interventions will include malabsorptive, restrictive, and mixed bariatric procedures. DISCUSSION: There appears to be inequities in access to bariatric surgery. In order to resolve the health inequity in the treatment of obesity, a synthesis of the literature is needed to explore and identify barriers to accessing bariatric surgery. It is anticipated that the results from this systematic review will have important implications for advancing solutions to minimize inequities in the utilization of bariatric surgery. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004920.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.