Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24559394›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2014

Health inequity in access to bariatric surgery: a protocol for a systematic review.

Timothy D Jackson, Rujun Zhang, Dresden Glockler, Jason Pennington, Jacinta I Reddigan, Ori D Rotstein, Janet Smylie, Laure Perrier, Lesley Gotlib Conn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A population based study of bariatric surgery in Illinois.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Marginal ulcers and associated risk factors after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Does Age Influence Bariatric Surgery Outcomes?Bariatric surgical practice and patient care · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy D JacksonDivision of General Surgery, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada. Timothy.Jackson@uhn.ca.
Rujun Zhang
Dresden Glockler
Jason Pennington
Jacinta I Reddigan
Ori D Rotstein
Janet Smylie
Laure Perrier
Lesley Gotlib Conn
St. Michael's Hospital · CASunnybrook Research InstituteThe Scarborough Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAWestern University · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is the only weight-loss treatment available that results in both sustained weight loss and improvements of obesity-related comorbidities. Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery are generally older, come from racial or ethnic minorities, are economically disadvantaged, and have low levels of education. However, the population who actually receives bariatric surgery does not reflect the individuals who need it the most. The objective is to conduct a systematic review of the literature exploring the inequities to the access of bariatric surgery. METHODS/

designEMBASE and Medline databases will be searched for observational studies that compared at least one of the PROGRESS-PLUS sociodemographic characteristics of patients eligible for bariatric surgery to those who actually received the procedure. Articles published in the year 1980 to present with no language restrictions will be included. For inclusion, studies must only include adults (≥18 years old) who meet National Institutes of Health (NIH) eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery defined as having either (1) a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or greater; or (2) BMI of 35 kg/m² or greater with significant weight-related comorbidities. Eligible interventions will include malabsorptive, restrictive, and mixed bariatric procedures. DISCUSSION: There appears to be inequities in access to bariatric surgery. In order to resolve the health inequity in the treatment of obesity, a synthesis of the literature is needed to explore and identify barriers to accessing bariatric surgery. It is anticipated that the results from this systematic review will have important implications for advancing solutions to minimize inequities in the utilization of bariatric surgery. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004920.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBariatric SurgeryHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidSocioeconomic FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24559394
PMCPMC3936930
OpenAlexW2116206496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.