Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24558435›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Long-term assessment of wild boar harvesting and cattle removal for bovine tuberculosis control in free ranging populations.

Gregorio Mentaberre, Beatriz Romero, Lucía de Juan, Nora Navarro-González, Roser Velarde, Ana Mateos, Ignasi Marco, Xavier Olivé-Boix, Lucas Domínguez, Santiago Lavín and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shedding-weighted network approaches for understanding tuberculosis maintenance in multihost systems using camera traps.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Nationwide seroprevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diseases of Iberian ibex (European journal of wildlife research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregorio MentaberreServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Beatriz RomeroVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain ; Departamento de Sanidad Animal. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía de JuanVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain ; Departamento de Sanidad Animal. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Nora Navarro-GonzálezServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Roser VelardeServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana MateosDepartamento de Sanidad Animal. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Ignasi MarcoServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier Olivé-BoixReserva Nacional de Caça dels Ports de Tortosa i Beseit, Roquetes, Tarragona, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain ; Departamento de Sanidad Animal. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago LavínServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Emmanuel SerranoServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain ; Estadística i Investigació Operativa, Departament de Matemàtica. Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversitat de Lleida · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild boar is a recognized reservoir of bovine tuberculosis (TB) in the Mediterranean ecosystems, but information is scarce outside of hotspots in southern Spain. We describe the first high-prevalence focus of TB in a non-managed wild boar population in northern Spain and the result of eight years of TB management. Measures implemented for disease control included the control of the local wild boar population through culling and stamping out of a sympatric infected cattle herd. Post-mortem inspection for detection of tuberculosis-like lesions as well as cultures from selected head and cervical lymph nodes was done in 745 wild boar, 355 Iberian ibexes and five cattle between 2004 and 2012. The seasonal prevalence of TB reached 70% amongst adult wild boar and ten different spoligotypes and 13 MIRU-VNTR profiles were detected, although more than half of the isolates were included in the same clonal complex. Only 11% of infected boars had generalized lesions. None of the ibexes were affected, supporting their irrelevance in the epidemiology of TB. An infected cattle herd grazed the zone where 168 of the 197 infected boars were harvested. Cattle removal and wild boar culling together contributed to a decrease in TB prevalence. The need for holistic, sustained over time, intensive and adapted TB control strategies taking into account the multi-host nature of the disease is highlighted. The potential risk for tuberculosis emergence in wildlife scenarios where the risk is assumed to be low should be addressed.

Indexed as

Sus scrofaAnimalsCattleCommunicable Disease ControlGenotypeMycobacterium bovisPrevalenceSpatio-Temporal AnalysisTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID24558435
PMCPMC3928305
OpenAlexW2006871621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.