Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24558297›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2014

A new method for predicting patient survivorship using efficient bayesian network learning.

Xia Jiang, Diyang Xue, Adam Brufsky, Seema Khan, Richard Neapolitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xia JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Diyang XueDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adam BrufskyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Seema KhanRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard NeapolitanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Detecting Genome Wide Epistasis with Efficient Bayesian Network LearningR00LM010822 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JIANG, XIA · 2012 to 2014
$565k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to develop and evaluate a new Bayesian network (BN)-based patient survivorship prediction method. The central hypothesis is that the method predicts patient survivorship well, while having the capability to handle high-dimensional data and be incorporated into a clinical decision support system (CDSS). We have developed EBMC_Survivorship (EBMC_S), which predicts survivorship for each year individually. EBMC_S is based on the EBMC BN algorithm, which has been shown to handle high-dimensional data. BNs have excellent architecture for decision support systems. In this study, we evaluate EBMC_S using the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset, which concerns breast tumors. A 5-fold cross-validation study indicates that EMBC_S performs better than the Cox proportional hazard model and is comparable to the random survival forest method. We show that EBMC_S provides additional information such as sensitivity analyses, which covariates predict each year, and yearly areas under the ROC curve (AUROCs). We conclude that our investigation supports the central hypothesis.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkbreast cancerCox proportional hazard modelrandom survival forestsurvivorship prediction

Identifiers

PMID24558297
PMCPMC3928477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.