ArticleQualitative health research2014
Vitamin D: an examination of physician and patient management of health and uncertainty.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing unnecessary vitamin testing in general practice: barriers and facilitators according to general practitioners and patients.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Vitamin D and Albumin Deficiency in a Swiss Orthopaedic Surgery In-Patient Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Importance of n-3 PUFA consumption during pregnancy: perception discrepancies between pregnant women and gynaecologists-obstetricians in Belgium.Public health nutrition · 2019Article
- Older Adults' Beliefs, Knowledge and Preferences for Achieving Healthy Vitamin D Status: A Narrative Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Article
- What Do People Know and Believe about Vitamin D?Nutrients · 2016Article
- Representations of the health value of vitamin D supplementation in newspapers: media content analysis.BMJ open · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vitamin D has been a topic of much research interest and controversy, and evidence is mixed concerning its preventive effects and health benefits. The purpose of our study was to explore the decision-making strategies used by both primary care providers and community members surrounding vitamin D in relation to uncertainty management theory. We conducted semistructured interviews with primary care providers (n = 7) and focus groups with community members (n = 89), and transcribed and coded using the constant comparative method. Themes for providers included awareness, uncertainty, patient role, responsibility, skepticism, uncertainty management, and evolving perceptions. Community member focus group themes included uncertainty, information sources, awareness/knowledge, barriers, and patient-provider relationship. Both providers and community members expressed uncertainty about vitamin D but used conflicting strategies to manage uncertainty. Awareness of this disconnect might facilitate improved patient-provider communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.