Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24558011›Full record

Trial reportPharmaceutical research2014

Does a hot drink provide faster absorption of paracetamol than a tablet? A pharmacoscintigraphic study in healthy male volunteers.

Lee Ann Hodges, Alison Hughes, Darren Targett, Michael J Durcan

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lee Ann HodgesBio-Images Research Ltd, Within Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK, leeann.hodges@bio-images.co.uk.
Alison Hughes
Darren Targett
Michael J Durcan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the hypothesis that paracetamol is absorbed faster from a hot drink than from a standard tablet using simultaneous scintigraphic imaging and pharmacokinetic sampling.

methodsTwenty-five healthy male volunteers received both paracetamol formulations in a randomised manner. The formulation administered in the first treatment arm was radiolabelled to allow scintigraphic monitoring. In both treatment arms, blood samples were taken for assessing paracetamol absorption.

resultsFollowing the hot drink, paracetamol absorption was both significantly faster and greater over the first 60 min post-dose compared with the tablet, as evidenced by the median time to reach t0.25 μg/mL of 4.6 and 23.1 min, respectively, and AUC0-60 of 4668.00 and 1331.17 h*ng/mL, respectively. In addition, tmax was significantly shorter for the hot drink (median time = 1.50 h) compared with the tablet (1.99 h). However, Cmax was significantly greater following the tablet (9,077 ng/mL) compared with the hot drink (8,062 ng/mL). Onset of gastric emptying after the hot drink was significantly faster than after the standard tablet (7.9 versus 54.2 min), as confirmed scintigraphically.

conclusionsCompared with a standard tablet, a hot drink provides faster absorption of paracetamol potentially due to more rapid gastric emptying.

Indexed as

BeveragesHealthy VolunteersHot TemperatureAcetaminophenAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansMaleMiddle AgedTabletsTime FactorsYoung AdultAcetaminophenTablets

Identifiers

PMID24558011
PMCPMC4153977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.