Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24557958›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Imaging guidelines and findings of extracranial glioblastoma.

Daniel Thomas Ginat, Pamela W Schaefer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extensive epidural extension growth of a glioblastoma: a case report and literature review.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Thomas GinatDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S, Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA, ginatd01@gmail.com.
Pamela W Schaefer
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracranial manifestations of glioblastoma are uncommon and include a wide spectrum of entities, such as primary spinal cord glioblastoma, spinal leptomeningeal metastasis, seeding into the scalp following intracranial glioblastoma resection, direct extension of an intracranial glioblastoma though a craniotomy defect, dissemination via shunt catheter, and systemic metastasis, including lymphatic and hematogenous spread. Imaging plays an important role in the management of patients with extracranial glioblastomas and guidelines for the imaging evaluation of these lesions are reviewed. For example, MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating glioblastoma involving the scalp and spine. In particular, advanced imaging techniques such as MR spectroscopy, MR perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging, and diffusion-tensor imaging can be useful for early detection and characterization of these lesions. CT and (18)FDG-PET are suitable modalities for evaluating systemic and CSF shunt-related metastases.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID24557958
OpenAlexW2087220153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.