ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2014
Common copy number variation detection from multiple sequenced samples.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Density Peak-Based Method to Detect Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- SM-RCNV: a statistical method to detect recurrent copy number variations in sequenced samples.Genes & genomics · 2019Article
- A Survey of Copy Number Variation in the Porcine Genome Detected From Whole-Genome Sequence.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- MSeq-CNV: accurate detection of Copy Number Variation from Sequencing of Multiple samples.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Joint sparse canonical correlation analysis for detecting differential imaging genetics modules.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Common copy number variations (CNVs) are small regions of genomic variations at the same loci across multiple samples, which can be detected with high resolution from next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique. Multiple sequencing data samples are often available from genomic studies; examples include sequences from multiple platforms and sequences from multiple individuals. By integrating complementary information from multiple data samples, detection power can be potentially improved. However, most of current CNV detection methods often process an individual sequence sample, or two samples in an abnormal versus matched normal study; researches on detecting common CNVs across multiple samples have been very limited but are much needed. In this paper, we propose a novel method to detect common CNVs from multiple sequencing samples by exploiting the concurrency of genomic variations in read depth signals derived from multiple NGS data. We use a penalized sparse regression model to fit multiple read depth profiles, based on which common CNV identification is formulated as a change-point detection problem. Finally, we validate the proposed method on both simulation and real data, showing that it can give both higher detection power and better break point estimation over several published CNV detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.